Search Results
September 22, 2019 @ 7:23 am
· Filed under Usage
"Singular 'they': Though singular 'they' is old, 'they' as a nonbinary proonoun is new — and useful", Merriam-Webster Words We're Watching: Much has been written on they, and we aren’t going to attempt to cover it here. We will note that they has been in consistent use as a singular pronoun since the late 1300s; that the development of […]
Permalink
July 12, 2019 @ 5:44 am
· Filed under Changing times, Language and gender
Farhad Manjoo, "Call Me 'They'", NYT 7/10/2019: The singular “they” is inclusive and flexible, and it breaks the stifling prison of gender expectations. Let’s all use it. I am your stereotypical, cisgender, middle-aged suburban dad. I dabble in woodworking, I take out the garbage, and I covet my neighbor’s Porsche. Though I do think men […]
Permalink
December 15, 2018 @ 11:02 am
· Filed under Language and economics, Language and science, Language change, Prescriptivism and descriptivism
Thought-provoking article by Lane Greene, the language columnist and an editor at The Economist: "Who decides what words mean: Bound by rules, yet constantly changing, language might be the ultimate self-regulating system, with nobody in charge", Aeon (12/6/18). Greene starts with a wallop: Decades before the rise of social media, polarisation plagued discussions about language. […]
Permalink
August 13, 2018 @ 7:31 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Lexicon and lexicography
Rachel Paige King ("The Draconian Dictionary Is Back", The Atlantic 8/5/2018) suggests that lexicographers might be (re)turning to prescriptivism: Since the 1960s, the reference book has cataloged how people actually use language, not how they should. That might be changing. […] The standard way of describing these two approaches in lexicography is to call them […]
Permalink
April 11, 2018 @ 9:15 pm
· Filed under Dialects, Dictionaries, Language and society, Language attitudes, Language teaching and learning, Prescriptivist non-poppycock, Standard language, Usage
One of the most well-known pieces of lexicographic history is the controversy that greeted the publication of Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. Whereas the predecessor of W3, Webster’s Second New etc., had been regarded as authoritatively prescriptive, W3 was condemned in the popular media for its descriptive approach, the widespread perception of which can be […]
Permalink
December 6, 2017 @ 12:12 pm
· Filed under Politics of language, singular "they", This blogging life
My most recent post started out as a very minor note of approval about the continuing spread of singular they in journalism. Then the person who sent me the quote realized that Phillip Garcia, named in the cited newspaper story, had a preference for being referred to with the pronoun they, which nullified the point. […]
Permalink
April 26, 2017 @ 11:02 am
· Filed under Dialects, Language and education, Reading
In a recent article Patriann Smith, a professor of Language, Diversity and Literacy Studies at Texas Tech, makes a bold proposal: that “nonstandard Englishes” such as African American English (AAE) and Hawai’i Creole English be used as the primary language of instruction in educating children who speak them. ("A Distinctly American Opportunity: Exploring Non-Standardized English(es) […]
Permalink
February 8, 2017 @ 10:28 am
· Filed under Language and gender, Politics of language, Prescriptivist poppycock, Semantics, singular "they"
The Times Literary Supplement diarist who hides behind the initials "J.C." makes this catty remark (issue of January 6, 2017, page 36) about Sidney E. Berger's The Dictionary of the Book: A Glossary of Book Collectors: "Predictions were that the Internet would do away with dealers' catalogs and it is true that many a dealer […]
Permalink
November 13, 2016 @ 7:10 am
· Filed under Morphology
From Jenny Chu, on November 9: I am a long-time follower of Language Log but usually comment on the Chinese and Vietnamese related topics by Prof. Mair. Yet I thought you might be amused by the attached conversation. It shows some nice examples of the playfulness and creativity of the human language faculty, as well […]
Permalink
September 21, 2016 @ 2:37 pm
· Filed under Errors, Humor, Morphology, Names, Prescriptivist poppycock, Words words words
It has come to my attention that many laypeople, even Language Log readers, are using incorrect plurals for flower names. "Geraniums" indeed! "Crocuses", for heaven's sake! Please get these right. There follows a list of 30 count nouns naming flowers, together with their approved grammatically correct plurals. Don't use incorrect plurals any more. Shape up.
Permalink
September 9, 2016 @ 8:18 am
· Filed under Peeving, Usage
I'm in San Francisco for InterSpeech 2016, where I'm involved in four papers over three days, so blogging will probably be a bit light. But I have a few minutes before the morning starts, so let me continue the discussion of Gabriel Roth's feelings ("Paper cut to the heart", 9/8/2016) by quoting from Bill S's comment: Some of […]
Permalink
July 1, 2016 @ 4:09 pm
· Filed under Peeving
Some eloquent 17th-century Quaker peeving, from The history of the life of Thomas Ellwood: Or, an account of his birth, education, &c. with divers observations on his life and manners when a youth: … Also several other remarkable passages and occurrences. Written by his own hand. To which is added, a supplement by J. W., […]
Permalink
May 8, 2016 @ 9:25 am
· Filed under Computational linguistics, Usage, Variation
The publisher's blurb for the fourth edition of Garner's Modern English Usage introduces a new feature: With more than a thousand new entries and more than 2,300 word-frequency ratios, the magisterial fourth edition of this book — now renamed Garner's Modern English Usage (GMEU)-reflects usage lexicography at its finest. […] The judgments here are backed up […]
Permalink