"'The purist jungle?'" (3/27/2026) featured Anne Abeillé's book "La Grammaire se Rebelle". As background, I should have cited "Le français va très bien, merci", Tract des linguistes 5/23/2023 (= "French is doing very well, thank you").
Read the rest of this entry »
Anne Abeillé's recently-published book "La Grammaire se Rebelle" describes linguistic prescriptivism as "la jungle puriste" / "the purist jungle".
But wait, don't prescriptivists want to turn the natural linguistic wilderness into a well-tended formal garden? Maybe, but in fact prescriptive rules are often incoherent as well as contrary to elite as well as informal usage, as we've often observed.
There's more to say about the many metaphors for linguistic prescriptivism — for example, the parallels with socio-political authority and rebellion — but for now, here's the avant-propos of Abeillé's book, followed by Google Translate's (very good) English version:
Read the rest of this entry »
Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a daily column that runs on Page 1 of The Asahi Shimbun. Today's column is titled "Different use of ‘zenzen’ fails to annoy Japanese language police" (9/29/29).
I still remember the shock of hearing the phrase "zenzen daijobu" for the first time about 20 years ago.
"Zenzen" is an adverb that modifies negative verbs and various other types of negative words and phrases, as in "zenzen shiranai," which means "don't know at all."
But "daijobu," which stands for OK, or fine, is an affirmative word, not negative. Now, if this isn't the ultimate example of the misuse of language, what is?
However, once I became accustomed to this phrase, I had to admit this was rather interesting.
"Zenzen daijobu" is fully accepted today, and its usage is apparently not entirely wrong.
According to "Nihonjin mo Nayamu Nihongo" (The Japanese language that puzzles even the Japanese people) by linguist Shigehiro Kato, the usage of zenzen with an affirmative word was already in evidence during the Edo Period (1603-1867), and was not rare during the ensuing Meiji Era (1868-1912), either.
In his novel "Botchan," Soseki Natsume (1867-1916) used zenzen with the affirmative phrase "warui desu" (it is bad).
Read the rest of this entry »
Thought-provoking article by Lane Greene, the language columnist and an editor at The Economist:
"Who decides what words mean: Bound by rules, yet constantly changing, language might be the ultimate self-regulating system, with nobody in charge", Aeon (12/6/18).
Greene starts with a wallop:
Decades before the rise of social media, polarisation plagued discussions about language. By and large, it still does. Everyone who cares about the topic is officially required to take one of two stances. Either you smugly preen about the mistakes you find abhorrent – this makes you a so-called prescriptivist – or you show off your knowledge of language change, and poke holes in the prescriptivists’ facts – this makes you a descriptivist. Group membership is mandatory, and the two are mutually exclusive.
But then he softens the blow by saying, "it doesn't have to be this way".
Read the rest of this entry »