Language Log

Myriam Toua, "Donald Trump's advisers 'urge him to declare martial law' amid latest grim poll", The Mirror_us 9/26/2026:

[emphasis added] Martial law in the US would mean the temporary replacement of government and regular law enforcement by a solely military force.

Standard civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, assembly, or protection from detention without trial, are all suspended in the case of martial law being enacted.

The president has already tried to claim greater federal control over elections, which under the Constitution are administered primarily at the state and local levels of government.

In February, he said Republicans should nationalize boating in at least 15 places.

The latest Tank McNamara strip imagines a conversation between referees before today's Ravens versus Cowboys game in Rio:

From Donald Trump's recent UN speech:

The United States also totally rejects any attempt to construct a globalist scheme to control for the artificial intelligence being spoken of so much now, hereinafter officially called Super Intelligence, changing the name, and that the use of the word "artificial" makes intelligence fake. It makes it sound fake. And it is not fake. It's actually amazing, but we have to be careful. In fact, it is exactly the opposite of what it purports.

From this point forward, all of United States documents and, hopefully the world's will be changed to use the much more accurate term "super" as opposed to "artificial". So it's Super Intelligence. In other words, welcome to the new world of Super Intelligence-SI. SI, let's see if that goes, it sounds much better. It is much better, and it's much more accurate. Let's see if I have any power. Maybe I do, and maybe I don't. We're going to find out pretty soon.

A recent congratulatory email, from a successful scientist to a member of his lab:

Teriffic!

I make similar mistakes myself all the time, and felt the need to check that the correct spelling is actually "terrific".

See "Conservation of (orthographic) gemination" (3/29/2004) for a nerdish exploration of the psycholinguistic issues involved.

At least in British primary schools, according to The Guardian: "‘That’s so AI!’ What gen Alpha’s biggest insult tells us", 9/24/2026.

Today's Frazz:

As counterpoint to Scott Alexander's impressive "King Ludd" exploration, consider this thematic image from The Spectator magazine ("The autistocracy: the men on the spectrum who rule our world"), featuring caricatures of Elon Musk, Dario Amodei, and Sam Altman engaged in modeling a cubical world:

A memorial service for Victor Mair will be held at Swarthmore Friends Meeting (12 Whittier Place, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania) on the afternoon of Saturday, October 10, between 2:00 and 5:00. 

In "A correlate of animacy" (9/27/2008) I noted that "A traditional and characteristic example of the role of animacy in English syntax is the way it affects the choice between the two ways of expressing genitive relations, X's Y vs. the Y of X.". I illustrated the effect with this table (from the days when Google gave estimated counts for search results):

Among the many interesting takes on OpenAI's claimed solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, I've been most interested in Sabine Hossenfelder's discussion on YouTube., partly because of the content but mainly because of Google AI's weird transcription. Its first sentence has two odd errors:

Open eye claims to have solved the Navia Stokes Millennium problem.

Elsewhere in the transcript we get 'OpenMai', 'openi', and 'Omei' as references to OpenAI, which you'd think Gemini would "know" about. And Gemini somehow "knows" to capitalize "Navia Stokes Millennium", but not to spell Navier correctly.

There are plenty of other errors, some odder than others, e.g. 'Sam Outman' for "Sam Altman", as you can see for yourself in the transcript and subtitling.

Wikipedia's entry on Univerbation tells us that "The univerbating process is epitomized in Talmy Givón's aphorism that 'today's morphology is yesterday's syntax'." Google hands the quote off to Gemini, at least in "AI mode", and explains:

The maxim "today's morphology is yesterday's syntax," coined by linguist Thomas Givon, means that grammatical word endings and affixes (morphology) evolve over time from separate, independent words once used together in phrases and sentences (syntax).

Alaina Demopoulos, "Women are giving their partners the ‘Illiterate Boyfriend’ test: ‘Do your best to pronounce these words’", The Guardian 9/3/2026:

There are common non-negotiables we look for in a prospective partner. They should be kind, caring and thoughtful. Having a shared interest helps. So does remembering important dates and anniversaries. But how much does it matter if they know how to pronounce the word “gnocchi”?

Turns out that’s a potential dealbreaker, at least according to a (rather judgy) cohort on TikTok. See: the “Illiterate Boyfriend” trend, which is testing some couples on the app. Users have compiled a list of what are essentially SAT words for women to ask their male partners to read. Many of these men – this is an overwhelmingly heterosexual activity – fail to finish the list unscathed. They trip over entries such as “hyperbole”, “cynicism”, “diaphragmatic” and the oft-butchered French term, “hors d’oeuvres”.

“I want you to do your best to pronounce these words,” one woman asks her boyfriend in a clip viewed more than 8.8m times. He gamely nails his first attempt, reading off the herb “thyme”. But he’s less successful with “epitome”, “challah” and “fuchsia”. (“Foo-chia?” he guesses). “Conscientious” and “faux pas” also prove tricky. He ends up with a score of five out of 17, or 29% – very much a failing grade.

…is ACHOO — "Ever sneeze immediately after stepping into the sun? It's not a coincidence":

Picture this: You walk out the door on a bright, sunny morning. And before you’ve even reached the car, you sneeze. Maybe even two or three times in a row.

It’s not allergies, and it’s not a coincidence. It’s a real reflex, called the photic sneeze reflex.

By some estimates, it affects roughly one in four people.

Researchers have studied it for decades and have even given it a punny name: ACHOO syndrome, short for Autosomal Dominant Compelling Helio-Ophthalmic Outburst