The phonotactics and graphic construction of "biang"
In my latest (of many) posts on that redoubtable sinograph, biáng ("Annals of Biang, Vienna edition" [1/3/25]), I posed this question: "How do we know that this character is to be pronounced in the second tone?"
Chris Button sensibly queried in reply: "So, something aside from the syllable being a phonotactic violation?"
Later, he elaborated, "Even if biang (regardless of tone) were allowed in 'standard' Mandarin, the second tone would not be allowed in any case. So we have a double violation of sorts: one on the phonemic level, and one on the tonemic level." This too is sensibly spoken.
The Xi'an topolect does have the tripthong -iang. (source)
The tones of Xi'an topolect, though four in number, are conspicuously different from those of MSM. (source)
Read the rest of this entry »