Search Results
November 15, 2010 @ 11:57 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock, Usage advice, Writing
"The problem with people who want to impose their linguistic tastes on others," says David Crystal, "is that they never do so consistently." I'm not so sure I agree that's the problem. Consistency wouldn't be quite enough to excuse grammar fascism. I'd say the problem with people who want to impose their linguistic tastes on […]
Permalink
September 12, 2010 @ 6:04 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
Geoff Pullum's musings on Simon Heffer's aprioristic prescriptivism ("English Grammar: Not for debate") were based on a report by the BBC, which is a reliably unreliable witness. So I wondered whether Mr. Heffer's usage advice was equally empty when taken straight from the source. The first sample that I found was "Strictly English: Part one", […]
Permalink
January 19, 2024 @ 3:26 pm
· Filed under Gender, Language and music, Usage
Masterful essay by the Music Director of Symphony Nova Scotia. "Maestro, Maestra, or Holly?" We asked our Music Director Holly Mathieson how she prefers to be referred to on the podium! Her reply may surprise you — or not: The earliest record we have of the Italian term Maestro in connection to music is from […]
Permalink
December 30, 2021 @ 8:24 am
· Filed under Changing times, Data bases, Environment and ecology, Evolution of language, Language and culture, Language and science, Language and society, Language change
New article in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), "The rise and fall of rationality in language", Marten Scheffer, Ingrid van de Leemput, Els Weinans, and Johan Bollen (12/21/21) 118 (51) e2107848118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107848118
Permalink
November 29, 2020 @ 1:34 pm
· Filed under Humor, Rhetoric
A new (?) joke-rhetoric pattern has appeared recently on twitter, e.g. I have a Jenna Ellis joke, but I can’t tell you what it is you just have to believe me — Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) November 28, 2020
Permalink
December 6, 2017 @ 12:12 pm
· Filed under Politics of language, singular "they", This blogging life
My most recent post started out as a very minor note of approval about the continuing spread of singular they in journalism. Then the person who sent me the quote realized that Phillip Garcia, named in the cited newspaper story, had a preference for being referred to with the pronoun they, which nullified the point. […]
Permalink
December 4, 2017 @ 2:19 pm
· Filed under Names, singular "they", Syntax
Evidence continues to pile up that singular they is naturally used in standard English whenever the antecedent is indefinite or quantifier-like (not a personal name, for example) and the sex of whoever it might turn out to identify is completely immaterial. My correspondent Daniel Sterman thought, and I thought too, that there was evidence of […]
Permalink
February 8, 2017 @ 10:28 am
· Filed under Language and gender, Politics of language, Prescriptivist poppycock, Semantics, singular "they"
The Times Literary Supplement diarist who hides behind the initials "J.C." makes this catty remark (issue of January 6, 2017, page 36) about Sidney E. Berger's The Dictionary of the Book: A Glossary of Book Collectors: "Predictions were that the Internet would do away with dealers' catalogs and it is true that many a dealer […]
Permalink
November 28, 2014 @ 10:47 am
· Filed under Language and the law
I spent Monday, November 24, in courtroom 13 of the Royal Courts of Justice in London. For a small part of that time, I testified as an expert witness; for the rest of the day, I was an interested spectator. What was the occasion? Peter Walker explains ("Andrew Mitchell and the Plebgate affair explained for non-Brits", The […]
Permalink
September 13, 2011 @ 9:45 am
· Filed under Changing times
Tom Chivers, the Telegraph's assistant comment editor, has posted some comments of his own on the linguistic side of a recent British parliamentary controversy ("Nadine Dorries, linguistic pioneer", The Telegraph 9/12/2011). David Cameron said something about Ms. Dorries that some perceived as offensive; he later apologized to her, and she responded: I don’t for one […]
Permalink
April 7, 2011 @ 4:35 pm
· Filed under Semantics, Words words words
Ben Yagoda shows in this article in Slate (not for the first time) that he is one English professor cum journalistic writer who really is smart as well as witty when writing about language. In this article he actually does some empirical research on the extent to which the prescriptivist conservatives are holding their ground […]
Permalink
February 11, 2011 @ 1:16 pm
· Filed under Language and culture
Following up on his tip about "bomb-diffusing" at the Telegraph, Robert Ayers sent me a link to an unexpected verbal inflection from the same source ("Icelandic volcano 'set to erupt"", 2/8/2011): By comparison, Bárdarbunga dwarves the Eyjafjallajökull volcano, which shutdown most of Europe's airspace last year after its ash cloud drifted across the continent's skies. […]
Permalink
November 20, 2010 @ 2:26 pm
· Filed under ambiguity, Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax, Writing
In his short but cutting review of Simon Heffer's Strictly English, Steven Poole remarks that the book "condemns hanging participles yet perpetrates a monster (on p165, too tedious to quote here)." What was this tedious monster, I feel sure you Language Log readers are asking? The sentence in question is the second one in this […]
Permalink