Search Results
January 10, 2009 @ 1:19 am
· Filed under Peeving, Prescriptivist poppycock
Orwell's Politics and the English Language is a beautifully written language crime, though it pretends to lay down the law. Furthermore I just noticed that its final law is rather curious. We'll get to that shortly. Orwell begins with the unjustified premise that language is in decline – unjustified because while he viciously attacks contemporary cases […]
Permalink
December 4, 2008 @ 10:17 am
· Filed under Linguistics in the comics
Over the years we've written many times about the disparagement of adjectives and adverbs by writers and usage advisers, most prominently in Strunk and White's "Write with nouns and verbs, not with adjectives and adverbs" (The Elements of Style, p. 71). Now Jef Mallett has taken the matter up in his comic strip Frazz: (Hat tip […]
Permalink
May 4, 2008 @ 8:28 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Writing systems
Stephen Smith writes: There's a New Yorker article about a Moldovan woman working for an organization that tries to track down victims of sex trafficking and bring them home, but it includes this weird bit: "She talks on the phone and knocks out memos and documents and e-mails in four languages and three alphabets—Russian, Romanian, […]
Permalink
April 30, 2008 @ 10:11 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
I mentioned recently here on Language Log that the people who live in terror of splitting infinitives appear never to have looked inside the handbooks that they claim to be respecting. I came upon a remarkable instance of this the other day while looking for something else. Punctuality Rules! is advertised as "A blog devoted […]
Permalink
April 8, 2008 @ 8:58 pm
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
Whee! I think I'm the first to post using the swanky new system, which has a wisywig interface and everything! First! Nodding to the giant posts of yesteryear, I return to the Language Log classic of finding howlers in that horrid little book. I hadn't looked at the thing since freshman composition, remembering it vaguely […]
Permalink
March 3, 2018 @ 7:41 pm
· Filed under Language and the law, Language attitudes, Lexicon and lexicography, This blogging life
The title of this post combines two topics that are popular with the Language Log audience, and that are not usually discussed together. It is also the title of a LAWnLinguistics post from 2012, shortly after the publication of Reading Law, a book about legal interpretation that was co-authored by Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner. […]
Permalink
April 26, 2017 @ 6:54 am
· Filed under Language and culture
Yesterday I was skimming randomly-selected sentences from a collection of English-language novels, and happened on this one from George Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four: "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words." This brought to mind two things I had never put together before, Orwell on Newspeak and Strunk on style.
Permalink
September 29, 2016 @ 4:07 pm
· Filed under Computational linguistics, Humor, Language and computers, Prescriptivist poppycock, Usage advice
Let me explain, very informally, what a predictive text imitator is. It is a computer program that takes as input a passage of training text and produces as output a new text that is composed quasi-randomly except that it matches the training text with regard to the frequencies of word or character sequences up to […]
Permalink
July 4, 2016 @ 10:29 am
· Filed under agreement, Ignorance of linguistics, Pedagogy, Peeving, prepositions, Prescriptivist poppycock, Usage advice, Writing
The many Americans in the University of Edinburgh's community of language and information scientists had to celebrate the glorious 4th on the 3rd this year, because the 4th is an ordinary working Monday. I attended a Sunday-afternoon gathering kindly hosted by the Head of the School of Informatics, Johanna Moore. We barbecued steadfastly in the […]
Permalink
March 19, 2016 @ 8:10 am
· Filed under Language and politics
From reader Brad D: You've been doing some interesting studies of Trump's speech patterns, and I wonder, have you done an analysis of his overall word choice since he started running for President? Watching him speak in interviews, I often get the impression that he's translating his thoughts into small words so as not to seem […]
Permalink
December 24, 2012 @ 9:51 am
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Usage advice
Reddit, for those few who might not know, is a popular bulletin-board site for posting and discussing links and texts. A voting system determines the order and position of entries. The site is divided into "subreddits" devoted to paticular topics, of which there are now tens of thousands. One of these countless subreddits is /r/grammar. Here "grammar", as […]
Permalink
September 6, 2012 @ 2:54 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, passives, Syntax, Writing
You know, people keep telling me that I shouldn't blame Strunk & White for the way so many Americans are clueless about identifying passive clauses. Others tell me I'm being prescriptive: I should let people use the word 'passive' however they want. (And you can, of course; you can use it to mean "box containing […]
Permalink
September 2, 2012 @ 7:51 am
· Filed under Usage advice
In 1917, The Nation's book reviewer objected to "the inexcusable irregularity of the style" in Helen Marie Bennett's Women and work: the economic value of college training, listing a number of specific "blunders" as evidence. One of these "blunders" can be found in the following passage: College girls may not realize why it is that many […]
Permalink