Search Results
May 18, 2024 @ 11:01 am
· Filed under Syntax, Words words words
There have been many LLOG posts on misuse of the term "passive voice", going back to 2003. As far as I can tell, the most recent post was "'Is it the passive voice you don't like?'", 8/11/2021. In "'Passive Voice' — 1397-2009 — R.I.P", I wrote that the traditional sense of passive voice has died after a […]
Permalink
August 11, 2021 @ 10:18 am
· Filed under Syntax, Words words words
Mary Harris, "Newsflash: Coronavirus Ain’t Going Nowhere", Slate 8/9/2021: I was a little hesitant to speak with Dr. Bernard Ashby. Ashby works in Florida, taking care of COVID patients. He is bearing witness to that state’s record-breaking surge of infections at the moment. It’s not that I didn’t think Ashby would have interesting things to […]
Permalink
June 4, 2021 @ 9:23 pm
· Filed under Language and society, Language and the media, Memes, Neologisms
In recent days, many people have called to my attention the phenomenon of tǎngpíng 躺平 ("lying flat") in the PRC. At first I thought it was just another passing fad of little significance, but the more I hear about it, the more I realize that it is a viral trend having potentially unsettling consequences for […]
Permalink
February 7, 2021 @ 8:01 am
· Filed under Language and politics
Marjorie Taylor Greene: "I was allowed to believe things that weren't true." This sentence deserves a place in the Museum of the Passive Voice. I'm honestly in awe of how MTG thought she could avoid any personal responsibility whatsoever *even for the thoughts in her head.* — Steve Silberman (@stevesilberman) February 6, 2021
Permalink
October 25, 2018 @ 7:40 am
· Filed under Language and politics
Anne Henochowicz, "Passive-Aggressive: Expressing misfortune, and resistance, in Mandarin", LA Review of Books, 10/23/2018: Strunk and White’s classic textbook Elements of Style taught us to avoid the passive voice in our writing. Our verbs should take action, not a back seat, whenever possible. (This advice is not universally accepted.) In Mandarin, however, the passive voice […]
Permalink
August 17, 2017 @ 2:33 am
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Language and the media, passives, Syntax, Usage advice, Writing
Mark Landler recently published an article in the New York Times under the headline "Where Predecessors Set Moral Standard, Trump Steps Back." Unlike his predecessors, he notes, the current president has rejected the very concept of moral leadership: On Saturday, in his first response to Charlottesville, Mr. Trump condemned the violence "on many sides." Then […]
Permalink
August 5, 2017 @ 1:35 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics
I've long since accepted that most people use "passive voice" to mean "vague about agency": see "Passive Voice" — 1397-2009 — R.I.P.", 3/12/2009. And I've made my peace with an extra-extended use of the term passive to convey only a vague sense of disapprobation: "'Passive construction' means… nothing at all?", 7/25/2009. But in David Brooks' […]
Permalink
February 27, 2017 @ 12:35 pm
· Filed under passives
While we at Language Log bemoan how often the passive voice is misidentified, and how often passive constructions are wrongly scapegoated, last night's Oscars debacle has provided us with a clearcut case of how agentless passives can serve to obfuscate. The official apology from PricewaterhouseCoopers for the envelope mixup, which led Warren Beatty and Faye […]
Permalink
July 12, 2015 @ 3:47 am
· Filed under Language and the media, passives, Rhetoric, Syntax
Those who want a clear example of truly dreadful prose, dreadful in large part because of the use of the much-loathed agentless passive, should look at examples like this, from the UK Daily Mail website on Sunday, July 12: The medical director of NHS England has disclosed that up to one in seven hospital procedures […]
Permalink
July 6, 2015 @ 2:39 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Language and business, Language and politics, passives
I'm grateful to Peter Howard and S. P. O'Grady, who within an hour or so both mailed me a link to this extraordinarily dumb article by James Gingell in The Guardian. As Howard and O'Grady pointed out, Gingell's wildly overstated rant illustrates a point I have made on Language Log many times before: that when language […]
Permalink
May 13, 2015 @ 9:19 pm
· Filed under Usage
We've been highly skeptical, in general, of usage mavens' often-mistaken disdain for what they call "passive voice". The objects of their animus are often not grammatically passive at all, but merely vague about agency — or sometimes just weakly phrased in some not-very-clear way. But Jerry Friedman points out a case where vagueness about agency […]
Permalink
August 11, 2014 @ 10:47 am
· Filed under Language and politics, Language and the media, passives, Syntax
Today I came upon something truly rare: a newspaper article about a passive-voice apology that (i) is correct about the apology containing a passive clause, but (ii) stresses that the oft-misdiagnosed passive should not be the thing we focus on and attempt to discourage, and (iii) cites actual linguists in support of the latter view! […]
Permalink
July 15, 2014 @ 3:15 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Language and the media, passives, Prescriptivist poppycock, Style and register, Usage advice
Radley Balko's Washington Post article "The curious grammar of police shootings" begins by reminding us about "mistakes were made" (an utterance so famous that it has its own Wikipedia page), and proceeds to quote a description of a shooting that is not by a policeman ("The suspect produced a semi-automatic handgun and fired numerous times […]
Permalink