Search Results
December 21, 2012 @ 1:04 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Syntax, passives
Josh Marshall, at TPM where he is editor, quotes President Barack Obama saying of last year's debt-ceiling negotiation shenanigans: "We're not going to play the same game that we saw happen in 2011," and notes an interesting change of sentence plan:
You can’t see it in the transcript. But he momentarily caught himself after ‘game’ and […]
Permalink
September 6, 2012 @ 2:54 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Syntax, Writing, passives
You know, people keep telling me that I shouldn't blame Strunk & White for the way so many Americans are clueless about identifying passive clauses. Others tell me I'm being prescriptive: I should let people use the word 'passive' however they want. (And you can, of course; you can use it to mean […]
Permalink
May 3, 2012 @ 12:03 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
Noam Chomsky in the Guardian uses 'anticipate' to mean 'expect'. I thought language was his thing.
— Daniel Hannan (@DanHannanMEP) May 1, 2012
Daniel Hannan is both a writer for The Telegraph and also Conservative MEP for South East England; and what he's complaining about is this passage (from "What next for Occupy?", The Guardian 4/30/2012):
But a […]
Permalink
April 25, 2012 @ 2:26 pm
· Filed under Silliness, Syntax, passives
Let the record show that in the post advertising Passive Voice Day 2012 on Shaun's Blog (April 27), which was naturally crying out to be written entirely in the passive voice, the writer, shaunm, has not made a single slip. Every single transitive verb in his post is in the passive. (There is one […]
Permalink
April 13, 2012 @ 6:12 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Syntax, passives
Tom Maguire, on a blog called JustOneMinute, attempts to fisk the arrest affidavit for George Zimmerman (the man in Sanford, Florida, who shot the unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin). Mention is made of "a lack of self-confidence from the prosecution, which switches to the passive voice at a crucial moment in the action." Uh-oh! […]
Permalink
March 30, 2012 @ 4:18 pm
· Filed under Syntax, passives
Matt Cherett on Buzzfeed said: "Tonight, my friend Frank sent me a link to the Wikipedia entry for RHOBH star Kim Richards, which he'd just rewritten entirely in the passive voice, making it nearly unreadable and, at the same time, infinitely better." He supplied a screenshot.
But the spoof rewriting, supposed to be in the […]
Permalink
March 16, 2012 @ 3:49 am
· Filed under Syntax, passives
A furious Daniel Schwammenthal at The Commentator excoriates The Economist for accusing the Israeli government of being delusional and paranoid. Asking rhetorically why there continues to be conflict between Israel and the Palestinians according to The Economist’s view, Schwammenthal adds a linguistic element to his political critique:
"Violent clashes and provocations erupted whenever the peace […]
Permalink
March 10, 2012 @ 7:41 am
· Filed under Linguistics in the comics
Panels two and three (of six) from David Malki's most recent Illustrated Jocularity, "The Wish of the Starhorse":
Permalink
February 24, 2012 @ 12:16 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, passives
You're the prime minister of Australia. (Well, you're not, actually, but this is my little rhetorical way of plunging you imaginatively in medias res. I want you to imagine that you're the prime minister of Australia.) Your foreign minister is a former prime minister that you ousted from the leadership in 2010, and […]
Permalink
January 4, 2012 @ 3:35 pm
· Filed under Crash blossoms, Psychology of language
Before reading further, consider the following newspaper headline, and make a mental note of what you think the article is about:
Permalink
January 4, 2012 @ 12:11 pm
· Filed under passives
After so many posts by Geoff Pullum (ok, rants, but I agree with him!) about journalists who use the word "passive" without knowing what it means, it actually caught my eye just now to see "passive" used perfectly correctly! Has it come to this? Should I say "Congratulations to Nate Silver!"? Here it is:
First, Mr. […]
Permalink
December 27, 2011 @ 4:29 pm
· Filed under Syntax, passives
Many have begged me to give up on my campaign to get journalists to stop using the term "passive" in its grammatical sense when they have no idea what it means. Some warn me that the quest is hopeless and no one will ever listen; some say I have failed to see that some […]
Permalink
November 23, 2011 @ 8:43 am
· Filed under Computational linguistics
Back in September of 2008, a Seattle-based start-up named SpinSpotter offered a tool that promised to detect "spin" or "bias" in news stories. The press release about the "Spinoculars" browser toolbar was persuasive enough to generate credulous and positive stories at the New York Times and at Business Week. But ironically, these very stories immediately set […]
Permalink
November 8, 2011 @ 4:53 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, Syntax, passives
People keep going on about the passive voice and revealing that they don't really know much about what it is. I have commented on this so often that some readers have written to beg me to stop. To the sensitive souls who just couldn't bear to be told one more time about a […]
Permalink
October 17, 2011 @ 7:14 am
· Filed under Peeving
The Académie française has recently added to its website a feature Dire, Ne pas dire ("Say, Don't Say")
… qui donne le sentiment de l’Académie française sur les fautes, les tics de langage et les ridicules qui s’observent le plus fréquemment dans le français contemporain.
… which gives the feelings of the Académie française on the errors, clichés, and […]
Permalink