Search Results
March 3, 2018 @ 7:41 pm
· Filed under Language and the law, Language attitudes, Lexicon and lexicography, This blogging life
The title of this post combines two topics that are popular with the Language Log audience, and that are not usually discussed together. It is also the title of a LAWnLinguistics post from 2012, shortly after the publication of Reading Law, a book about legal interpretation that was co-authored by Justice Scalia and Bryan Garner. […]
Permalink
February 22, 2018 @ 4:16 pm
· Filed under Language and the law
(Cross-posted from LAWnLinguistics.) When grammatical questions come up in legal cases, the lawyers and judges will want to support their arguments and analyses with citations to books about grammar. Most of the time, they cite books intended for a general audience, such as the McGraw-Hill Handbook of English Grammar and Usage, The Elements of Grammar, […]
Permalink
April 26, 2017 @ 6:54 am
· Filed under Language and culture
Yesterday I was skimming randomly-selected sentences from a collection of English-language novels, and happened on this one from George Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four: "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words." This brought to mind two things I had never put together before, Orwell on Newspeak and Strunk on style.
Permalink
September 29, 2016 @ 4:07 pm
· Filed under Computational linguistics, Humor, Language and computers, Prescriptivist poppycock, Usage advice
Let me explain, very informally, what a predictive text imitator is. It is a computer program that takes as input a passage of training text and produces as output a new text that is composed quasi-randomly except that it matches the training text with regard to the frequencies of word or character sequences up to […]
Permalink
July 4, 2016 @ 10:29 am
· Filed under agreement, Ignorance of linguistics, Pedagogy, Peeving, prepositions, Prescriptivist poppycock, Usage advice, Writing
The many Americans in the University of Edinburgh's community of language and information scientists had to celebrate the glorious 4th on the 3rd this year, because the 4th is an ordinary working Monday. I attended a Sunday-afternoon gathering kindly hosted by the Head of the School of Informatics, Johanna Moore. We barbecued steadfastly in the […]
Permalink
June 12, 2016 @ 7:13 am
· Filed under Language and sports
Today's SMBC: Mouseover title: "Life rule: Never do anything you've done more than 3 times already."
Permalink
March 19, 2016 @ 8:10 am
· Filed under Language and politics
From reader Brad D: You've been doing some interesting studies of Trump's speech patterns, and I wonder, have you done an analysis of his overall word choice since he started running for President? Watching him speak in interviews, I often get the impression that he's translating his thoughts into small words so as not to seem […]
Permalink
December 18, 2015 @ 8:45 am
· Filed under Linguistic history
In "A quantitative history of which-hunting", I reproduced a plot due to (an anonymous colleague of) Jonathan Owen, showing that texts from the last half of the 20th century saw a decrease in the relative frequency of NOUN which VERB, and an increase in the relative frequency of NOUN that VERB. Jonathan took this to indicate the […]
Permalink
April 9, 2015 @ 4:46 am
· Filed under Humor, Usage
John McIntyre's "Grammarnoir 7: 'The Corpus Had a Familiar Face'" is available at The Baltimore Sun. At the start of the story, a thug with "fists the size of Westphalian hams and the cold, dead eyes of a community press content coach" strong-arms John's narrator into a big room "with a glass wall overlooking a formal garden. Around […]
Permalink
March 2, 2015 @ 6:07 am
· Filed under Grammar, Prescriptivist poppycock
Part 2 of the Wikihow listicle "Be a Good Writer" is about learning vital skills, and item 3 of part 2 says you should "Learn the rules of grammar". Where should you turn to find out what they are? The article (as accessed on March 2, 2015) says: If you have a question about grammar, […]
Permalink
February 4, 2015 @ 4:11 am
· Filed under Language and the movies
Last night I went out to see Inherent Vice, the only film so far made of a Thomas Pynchon novel. Two and a half hours of bafflement later, the credits rolled. I was with two distinguished computational linguists, Mark Steedman and Bonnie Webber. "It was more coherent than the book," said Mark, who liked the […]
Permalink
July 15, 2014 @ 3:15 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Language and the media, passives, Prescriptivist poppycock, Style and register, Usage advice
Radley Balko's Washington Post article "The curious grammar of police shootings" begins by reminding us about "mistakes were made" (an utterance so famous that it has its own Wikipedia page), and proceeds to quote a description of a shooting that is not by a policeman ("The suspect produced a semi-automatic handgun and fired numerous times […]
Permalink
January 17, 2014 @ 6:29 pm
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
John McIntyre ("You have not seen it all yet", You Don't Say 1/17/2014) relays a correspondent's claim to have gotten this note from her college professor: Look up Strunk and White (1918) for good rules on writing. Also, I recommend you do not use prepositions at the beginning or end of sentences their use does […]
Permalink