Search Results
May 19, 2008 @ 9:50 am
· Filed under Language and gender, Language and politics
According to a recently published and very influential book, scientists have recently discovered some amazing things about the differences between boys and girls. For example, girls' hearing is said to be an order of magnitude more sensitive than boys' hearing. And this is a difference with major consequences in public as well as private life: […]
Permalink
May 17, 2008 @ 11:56 am
· Filed under Language and gender, Language and politics
As a result of some Language Log posts a couple of years ago, I get quite a few inquiries from journalists about Dr. Leonard Sax and his science-based arguments for single-sex education. It's in the nature of things that only a small fraction of such discussions wind up in the resulting articles. For example, for […]
Permalink
August 7, 2014 @ 7:35 am
· Filed under Language and gender
In a ten-year-old LLOG post ("Gender and tags" 5/9/2004), I cited "the complexity of findings about language and gender, where published claims sometimes contradict one another, and where the various things that 'everybody knows' are not always confirmed by experiment", and warned that This happens in every area of rational inquiry, but it's especially common in cases […]
Permalink
November 7, 2011 @ 6:52 am
· Filed under Language and culture, Rhetoric
Last Friday, I heard Sarah-Jane Leslie talk about "Generics and Generalization": Generic sentences express generalizations about kinds, such as "tigers are striped", "ducks lay eggs", and "ticks carry Lyme disease". I present and review emerging evidence from adults and children that suggests that generics articulate cognitively default generalizations — i.e., they express basic, early-developing inductive generalizations […]
Permalink
August 24, 2010 @ 8:54 am
· Filed under Language and gender
That's the title of Cordelia Fine's new book, due out on August 30. Some reviews: Katherine Bouton, "Peeling Away Theories on Gender and the Brain", NYT 8/23/2010; Robin McKie, "Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics", The Observer 8/15/2010; "Q&A: 'Delusions of Gender' author Cordelia Fine", USA Today 8/9/2010; Louise Grey, "New […]
Permalink
April 4, 2010 @ 7:17 am
· Filed under The language of science
A web search for the phrase "Men don't listen" turns up lots of pop-psychology books and articles. There's Allan and Barbara Pease's relationship self-help book Why Men Don't Listen and Women Can't Read Maps; an online chapter from the book Be Your Own Therapist with the title "Men Don't Listen; Men Don't Communicate"; another self-help […]
Permalink
December 17, 2009 @ 5:01 am
· Filed under Language and gender, Linguistics in the comics
It's been a while since we posted on differences between the sexes, so here's a Zippy on the subject: Yes, I know, this isn't really about language, but Language Log stumbled into sex differences a few years ago, mostly thanks to Leonard Sax and Louann Brizendine (via David Brooks).
Permalink
August 16, 2009 @ 1:41 pm
· Filed under Computational linguistics
On the basis of recent research in social psychology, I calculate that there is a 53% probability that Geoff Pullum is male. That estimate is based the percentage of the and a/an in a recent Language Log post, "Stupid canine lexical acquisition claims", 8/12/2009. But we shouldn't get too excited about our success in correctly […]
Permalink
August 10, 2008 @ 12:51 pm
· Filed under The language of science
Here's another interview-as-blog-post. This time the interviewer is someone writing a book, who has read some of the Language Log posts linked here and here; and the subject of the interview is "the new fashion for biological determinism in debates about differences between the sexes".
Permalink
June 20, 2008 @ 7:41 am
· Filed under Language and gender, The language of science
Yesterday ("Sexual pseudoscience from CNN", 6/19/2008), I promised to follow up with a discussion of Jennifer Connellan et al., "Sex Differences in Human Neonatal Social Perception", Infant Behavior & Development, 23:113-18, 2000. This post fulfills that promise. But first, I want to say something about the appropriate role of such studies in influencing public opinion […]
Permalink
June 19, 2008 @ 7:35 am
· Filed under Language and gender, The language of science
The old oppositions between girls and boys — sugar and spice vs. snips and snails — continue to be reinforced and extended in the popular press by sexual pseudoscience. For example, Leonard Sax's false claims about boys' inferior hearing are front and center again in Paula Spencer, "Is it harder to raise boys or girls?", […]
Permalink
May 20, 2008 @ 6:03 am
· Filed under Language and gender, Language and politics, The language of science
This post follows up on my promise ("Sax Q & A", 5/17/2008) to respond to Dr. Leonard Sax's answer to my 2006 critique of the sensory physiology and psychophysics in his 2005 book Why Gender Matters. The first installment, yesterday, was about hearing ("Liberman on Sax on Liberman on Sax on hearing", 5/19/2008). This one […]
Permalink
August 28, 2009 @ 10:29 am
· Filed under Books
I'm spending today at Berkeley, participating in a one-day conference on "The Google Books Settlement and the Future of Information Access". I'll live-blog the discussion as the day unfolds, leaving comments off until it's over. I believe that the sessions are being recorded, and the recordings will be available on the web at some time […]
Permalink