Search Results
September 29, 2012 @ 8:41 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Variation
According to Cordelia Hebblethwaite, "Britishisms and the Britishisation of American English", BBC News 9/26/2012: There is little that irks British defenders of the English language more than Americanisms, which they see creeping insidiously into newspaper columns and everyday conversation. But bit by bit British English is invading America too. "Spot on – it's just ludicrous!" […]
Permalink
September 9, 2012 @ 3:38 pm
· Filed under Language attitudes, Language change, Prescriptivist poppycock, Style and register, Usage advice
In the spirit of Geoff Pullum's lyrical prescriptive poppycock offering, I can offer some Raymond Chandler in verse and letter. And this being Language Log, I will follow it with a light dessert of cheap science. Here's a small sample of Chandler's 1947 poem Lines to a Lady With an Unsplit Infinitive for your edification: There […]
Permalink
September 6, 2012 @ 2:54 pm
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, passives, Syntax, Writing
You know, people keep telling me that I shouldn't blame Strunk & White for the way so many Americans are clueless about identifying passive clauses. Others tell me I'm being prescriptive: I should let people use the word 'passive' however they want. (And you can, of course; you can use it to mean "box containing […]
Permalink
September 2, 2012 @ 7:51 am
· Filed under Usage advice
In 1917, The Nation's book reviewer objected to "the inexcusable irregularity of the style" in Helen Marie Bennett's Women and work: the economic value of college training, listing a number of specific "blunders" as evidence. One of these "blunders" can be found in the following passage: College girls may not realize why it is that many […]
Permalink
July 26, 2012 @ 8:34 am
· Filed under Usage advice
Helen Sword, "Zombie Nouns", The New York Times 7/23/2012: Take an adjective (implacable) or a verb (calibrate) or even another noun (crony) and add a suffix like ity, tion or ism. You’ve created a new noun: implacability, calibration, cronyism. Sounds impressive, right? Nouns formed from other parts of speech are called nominalizations. Academics love them; […]
Permalink
July 1, 2012 @ 10:26 am
· Filed under Peeving
In "Anti-fascist impact" (6/25/2012), I briefly took up the question of where William Strunk might have gotten his 1918 prescription about the use of however: In the meaning nevertheless, not to come first in its sentence or clause. The roads were almost impassable. However, we at last succeeded in reaching camp. The roads were almost […]
Permalink
June 25, 2012 @ 9:56 am
· Filed under Language and culture
Tom Chivers, "Two cheers for Alan Duncan, grammar fascist", The Telegraph 6/25/2012: Alan Duncan, the Minister of State for International Development, has become perhaps the first Conservative minister in history to describe himself as a fascist, rather than waiting for someone on Twitter to do it for him. Specifically, "Lofty", as he is known, has […]
Permalink
June 16, 2012 @ 8:02 am
· Filed under Language and culture
In the latest issue of The New Yorker, Jane Mayer has a profile of Bryan Fischer ("BULLY PULPIT: An evangelist talk-show host’s campaign to control the Republican Party", The New Yorker, 6/18/2012), which starts this way: Tupelo, Mississippi, is best known as the birthplace of Elvis Presley, and his childhood home remains the town’s top […]
Permalink
June 9, 2012 @ 10:16 am
· Filed under passives, Silliness, Syntax
While shopping for a card for my dad the other day (he will be 90 on August 7) I noticed a sign of the times: a birthday card with a big silver "100" on it — one of quite a few, in fact, manufactured specifically for birthdays of people who reach that age. The extreme longevity made […]
Permalink
June 6, 2012 @ 3:47 am
· Filed under coordination, passives, Prescriptivist poppycock, Silliness, Usage advice, Writing
The Queen's English Society (QES), mentioned only a couple of times here on Language Log over the past few years, is no more. It has ceased to be. On the last day of this month they will ring down the curtain and it will join the choir invisible. It will be an ex-society. Said Rhea […]
Permalink
May 12, 2012 @ 9:41 am
· Filed under Language and culture
Yesterday, I discussed Joan Acocella's strange misreading of two essays introducing the fifth edition of the American Heritage Dictionary ("Rules and 'rules'", 5/11/2012). John Rickford wrote that "the patterns of variation and change … are regular rather than random, governed by unconscious, language-internal rules and restrictions" — but Ms. Acocella took this defense of "vernaculars […]
Permalink
April 13, 2012 @ 6:12 am
· Filed under Language and the media, passives, Syntax
Tom Maguire, on a blog called JustOneMinute, attempts to fisk the arrest affidavit for George Zimmerman (the man in Sanford, Florida, who shot the unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin). Mention is made of "a lack of self-confidence from the prosecution, which switches to the passive voice at a crucial moment in the action." Uh-oh! Passive […]
Permalink
February 24, 2012 @ 12:16 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, passives
You're the prime minister of Australia. (Well, you're not, actually, but this is my little rhetorical way of plunging you imaginatively in medias res. I want you to imagine that you're the prime minister of Australia.) Your foreign minister is a former prime minister that you ousted from the leadership in 2010, and now a […]
Permalink