The tyranny of literacy
« previous post | next post »
Following on Mark's "Literacy: peasants and philosophers" (10/10/25) yesterday, also a number of posts on this subject that we have written in the past (see the bibliography), i herewith offer an account of myth and literacy:
Memories within myth
The stories of oral societies, passed from generation to generation, are more than they seem. They are scientific records
By Patrick Nunn, Aeon (4/6/23)
This is a long, richly documented article, from which I will take only a few representative selections. It begins:
In the 1880s, the American journalist William Gladstone Steel made several visits to a freshwater lake that filled the caldera of an extinct volcano in Oregon. For Steel, these visits were the fulfilment of a dream that began while he was just a schoolboy in Kansas. It was one day in 1870, while reading the newspaper wrapped around his school lunch, that he noticed an article about the ‘discovery’ of a spectacular body of freshwater named Crater Lake. ‘In all of my life,’ Steel would later recall, ‘I never read an article that took the intense hold on me that that one did…’ When he finally made it to the lake in 1885, he was so captivated that he determined to have the area designated as a National Park. But designation was not easily gained and required extensive documentation of the region.
To help with the reconnaissance, Steel engaged guides from the local Klamath peoples, who had occupied the area for countless generations. During their work together, Steel noted that they never once looked at the lake itself, instead ‘making all sorts of mysterious signs and staring directly at the ground’ – a sign that the Klamath regarded Crater Lake as a powerful place where a great cataclysm once happened and might happen again. For, as Klamath stories tell, buried deep beneath the lake waters is the spirit of Llao, a demon who lived within the volcano that once towered above Crater Lake. In a past age, Llao terrorised the Klamath by showering them with hot rocks and shaking the ground on which they lived. This continued until Llao was confronted by the benevolent spirit Skell who pulled the volcano down on the demon and created Crater Lake above.
What sounded to Steel like myth is more than just a story. It is a memory of an eruption that caused a volcano to collapse and form a giant caldera that, as many do, filled with freshwater. The eruption occurred 7,700 years ago, but the Klamath had preserved its story and even sustained associated protocols, such as not looking directly at the lake. Though they did not read nor write when Steel worked with them in the late 19th century, the Klamath people knew a story about an event that had occurred more than 7 millennia earlier, a story carried across perhaps 300 generations by word of mouth.
Many literate people today believe this kind of thing is impossible or, at best, an anomaly, because they evaluate the abilities of oral (or ‘pre-literate’) societies by the yardsticks of literate ones, where information seems far more readily accessible to anyone who seeks it. And, in doing so, they undervalue the ability of these oral societies to store, organise and communicate equivalent amounts of information. I have called this ‘the tyranny of literacy’: the idea that literacy encourages its exponents to subordinate the understandings of others who appear less ‘fortunate’. But accounts like Steel’s are beginning to help break apart this idea: oral traditions, rather than being subordinate, are capable of transmitting just as much useful information as the technologies of reading and writing.
Nunn goes on go recount the work of the French ethnographer Arnold van Gennep in familiarizing himself with the "Indigenous Australian (Aboriginal) oral stories, concluding that these include ‘fragments of a catechism, a liturgical manual, a history of civilisation, a geography textbook, and to a lesser extent a manual of cosmography’."
One of Nunn's main themes, other than volcanic eruptions, are stories of submergence after the end of the last great ice age when the ocean surface was 120 meters lower than it is now and thick ice sheets covered many continents. As the ice sheets melted, the sea waters rose and the shores were submerged. Such submergence stories were not true only of remote, exotic lands, but were also prevalent in locations closer to home, such as the Hebrides. "…Mary Mackay, the chief informant for the Hebridean stories, was clearly also loquacious, rendering her ‘vivid’ tales in ‘felicitous Gaelic’ according to Alexander Carmichael, the folklorist who collected them during the 1860s."
As Nunn points out,
These ‘myths’ are not fiction. Most of the ancient myths of long-established cultures have an empirical core. They are not inventions but observations, filtered through worldviews from potentially thousands of years ago and clothed with layers of narrative embellishment before they reach us today. Framed within the science of their day, they represent knowledge often from times far earlier than those in the world’s oldest books.
The ‘tyranny of literacy’ makes us sceptical of knowledge being retained in oral societies for such a long time
Nunn has made some fundamental discoveries of his own in the realm of oral traditions:
My earliest encounters with people who could neither read nor write (and nor, in this case, speak English) were in the Pacific Islands where I lived and worked for more than two decades. As a geologist, my research took me to some of the remotest corners of the Pacific region, where my self-belief as a conventional scientist gradually eroded and was replaced with an appreciation of other worldviews equally as valid as that with which I had been inculcated. I also became disabused of the belief – held by most Western-educated literate people – that orality is inferior to literacy. As carefully explained by Walter Ong in his classic book Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (1982), not only has literacy transformed human consciousness, shifting it from sound-focused to sight-focused, but is has also ‘weaken[ed] the mind’. For, as Ong wrote: ‘Those who use writing will become forgetful, relying on an external resource for what they lack in internal resources.’ Plato’s Socrates noted the same thing, arguing that writing ‘destroys memory’, something that sustained oral societies in every part of the inhabited world for tens of thousands of years.
If there was a pivotal moment in my journey towards an awareness of the depth and breadth of oral knowledges, it was late one afternoon in 2004 when, with some colleagues from the Fiji Museum, I started a conversation with Maikeli Rasese at his home in Denimanu Village, the only settlement on Yadua Island in northern Fiji. We wanted to learn something about the human history of Yadua, of which he was a foremost authority. He described each coastal embayment in turn, relating the stories of the people who occupied it over the past few generations, along with eventful moments in its history, such as a shipwreck, a tidal wave, even the heroic repulsing of invading forces. None of this was written down. All of it was in his head. And all came from his lips in perfect order, fluently, just as though he had been reading from a text in front of him.
I had been privileged to witness the expounding of ‘oral traditions’ at their best
After a few hours, as we neared the end of our narrative circumnavigation of Yadua – not, by any measure, a large island [VHM: spans 14 km² and has a coastline of 34 km] – I assumed we would shortly conclude our evening. But Rasese was not finished. Having exhausted his historical knowledge of the island, he then proceeded to explain where its people had come from originally, how they had abandoned their previous homes on other islands because of growing aggression from new arrivals, and how others of their clan had dispersed but remained in touch, periodically renewing their ties, sometimes through intermarriage, sometimes through the ritualised exchange of traditional valuables. It was 2 am when, seeing his audience drooping with fatigue, Rasese finally ended his storytelling.
The erosion of oral storytelling as a result of information processing technologies has had a decisive impact on the memory skills of modern man:
Half a century ago, people might remember 10 or 20 telephone numbers, but today how many? Smartphones have almost removed any need to remember phone numbers, birthdays, addresses or even names. These developments can make life easier, no question, but they also encourage us to undervalue what we have lost.
Humans have a deep-rooted affection for narrative that, I suggest, was born long ago in oral societies. In those times, listening to the stories of your elders was mandatory, not optional. If you didn’t listen, you couldn’t learn. And if you didn’t learn, you wouldn’t likely survive. So strong was the communal will to survive, that everyone learned – there was no choice. People in oral societies learned to be attentive listeners and, later in life, habitual storytellers.
…
This essay develops ideas discussed in Patrick Nunn’s books The Edge of Memory: Ancient Knowledge, Oral Tradition and the Post-Glacial World (2018) and Worlds in Shadow: Submerged Lands in Science, Memory and Myth (2021), both published by Bloomsbury.
In recent months, one of our prominent themes on Language Log has been the nature and impact of AI and LLMs. I believe that we have barely begun to scratch the surface of these incredibly powerful technologies. How will they shape the functioning of our own minds? Many people I know, including family, friends, professional colleagues, and, yes, readers of Language Log, engage in days long colloquies with ChagGPT and Ask AI Anything.
As we have pointed out before on Language Log and elsewhere, the world's first grammarian (Pāṇini [mid-1st millennium BC]) and the world's earliest epic poet (Homer [8th c. BC]) were both illiterate. Because of the Indian suspicion toward writing, even though the Vedas are among the oldest religious texts on earth (mid-2nd millennium BC), they weren't actually written down until many centuries after they were composed.
Vedas are śruti ("what is heard"), distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smr̥ti ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman" and "impersonal, authorless", revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient sages after intense meditation.
The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques. The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their phonology rather than the semantics, and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer. By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base."
Mantras — sacred syllables — SOUNDS
A mantra (/ˈmæntrə, ˈmʌn-/ MAN-trə, MUN-; Pali: mantra) or mantram (Devanagari: मन्त्रम्) is a sacred utterance, a numinous sound, a syllable, word or phonemes, or group of words (most often in an Indo-Iranian language like Sanskrit or Avestan) believed by practitioners to have religious, magical or spiritual powers. Some mantras have a syntactic structure and a literal meaning, while others do not.
ꣽ, ॐ (Aum, Om) serves as an important mantra in various Indian religions. Specifically, it is an example of a seed syllable mantra (bijamantra). It is believed to be the first sound in Hinduism and as the sonic essence of the absolute divine reality. Longer mantras are phrases with several syllables, names and words. These phrases may have spiritual interpretations such as a name of a deity, a longing for truth, reality, light, immortality, peace, love, knowledge, and action. Examples of longer mantras include the Gayatri Mantra, the Hare Krishna mantra, Om Namah Shivaya, the Mani mantra, the Mantra of Light, the Namokar Mantra, and the Mūl Mantar. Mantras without any actual linguistic meaning are still considered to be musically uplifting and spiritually meaningful.

I've always thought of Om as the ultimate sacred, cosmic sound that contains within it all the sounds of the universe, beginning deep in the back of the throat and progressing forward to the lips — passing through the entire vocal tract — from nothing (no sound) to nothing (no sound).
Very satisfying and soothing to pronounce — softly and slowly.
Without being Luddites, some of my dearest friends reject certain elements of modern technology in order to protect their innate abilities. Xu Wenkan, with whom we are well acquainted on Language Log (see special bibliography below), refused to learn how to process sinographs in computers, and he was less liable to character amnesia than any Chinese person I know. I myself do not wish to learn how to "text". Most astonishing of all, many of my super smart students are writing better by hand this year than their predecessors did in the past few decades. I behold their papers and essays and am breathless at the elegance of their handwritten compositions. I know not what to attribute this felicitous development to.
Another of my closest scholarly friends, Tsu-Lin Mei, resisted computers. Instead, he wrote out his papers on an old mechanical typewriter using Eaton's Corrasable Bond. Sure, it smudged, but Tsu-Lin was happily and intimately in control of his composition.
"Frater studiorum: Tsu-Lin Mei (1933-2023)" (10/22/23)
A final note in this vein. One of the best students I have encountered at Penn used to spend half an hour to an hour writing out sutras meticulously and neatly every night before going to bed. She didn't call it "copying sutras", but rather it was "writing sutras". I asked her if she was mindful of the meaning of what she was writing, and she said no. It was the sheer act of writing carefully, exactingly that mattered to her. It was a kind of calming, esthetically pleasing meditation that I believe lulled her to sleep.
A Xu Wenkan reader
- "A letter writer of / for the 20th and 21st century" (1/13/25) — with an extensive bibliography on character amnesia
- "Character Amnesia" (7/22/10)
- "Xu Wenkan (1943-2023)" (1/10/23)
- Xu, Wenkan. "The Discovery of the Xinjiang Mummies and Studies of the Origin of the Tocharians". The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 23.3-4 (Fall/Winter, 1995), 357–369.
- Xu, Wenkan. "The Tokharians and Buddhism". In Studies in Central and East Asian Religions, 9 (1996), 1–17.
- Xu, Wenkan. "Beyond Deciphering: An Overview of Tocharian Studies over the Past Thirty Years". In Great Journeys across the Pamir Mountains. Leiden: Brill, 2018. Pp. 128–139.
- Wei, Lanhai, Hui Li, and Wenkan Xu. "The separate origins of the Tocharians and the Yuezhi: Results from recent advances in archaeology and genetics". In: M. Malzahn, Michaël Peyrot, Hannes Fellner, and Theresa-Susanna Illés, eds. Tocharian Texts in Context: International Conference on Tocharian Manuscripts and Silk Road Culture, June 25-29th, 2013. Bremen: Hempen Verlag, 2015. Pp. 277-300.
- "The origins and affinities of Tocharian" (8/20/23)
Selected readings
- "'In Pāṇini We Trust'"(12/15/22)
- "The stupendous powers of memorization in the Indian tradition" (10/23/20)
- "Antakshari recitation in India" (7/1/23)
- "Drama at the National Spelling Bee" (6/7/25)
- "It is that time of the year again" (6/3/24) — with lengthy bibliography on the Spelling Bee
- "Spelling and intuition" (11/30/23)
- "Spelling bee 2022 — back on track" (6/4/22)
- "Spelling bee 2021 – Indian streak broken!" (7/9/21)
- "What happened to the spelling bee this year?" (10/21/20)
- "Spelling Bee 2019" (5/31/10)
- "The worldly sport of spelling" (6/2/18)
- “Spelling bee champs” (6/1/14)
- “Spelling bees and character amnesia” (8/7/13)
- “Brain imaging and spelling champions” (8/7/15)
- “Spoken Sanskrit” (1/9/16)
- "Once more on the mystery of the national spelling bee" (5/27/16)
- "Spelling bees in the 1940s" (7/10/16)
- "Yet again on the mystery of the national spelling bee" (6/5/17)
Mythology
- Paul T. Barber & Elizabeth W. Barber, When They Severed Earth from Sky: How the Human Mind Shapes Myth (Princeton U. P., 2005)
- Michael Witzel, The origins of the world's mythologies (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
[Thanks to John Rohsenow and Jim Unger]
Mok Ling said,
October 11, 2025 @ 7:12 pm
I am reminded of a line from the Huainanzi:
昔者,蒼頡作書,而天雨粟,鬼夜哭;伯益作井,而龍登玄雲。神棲崑崙;能愈
多而德愈薄矣。
Formerly,
when Cangjie made writing, Heaven rained millet, and demons wept all
through the night.
When Boyi made wells, dragons went up into the dark clouds, and the
spirits fled to Kunlun.
As wisdom and ability grew ever more abundant, virtue grew ever more scarce.
Peter Cyrus said,
October 12, 2025 @ 5:36 am
My skepticism of oral transmission and memory derives not from its lack of power or capacity, but from concerns about its accuracy. Events and stories are confounded, or evolve in the direction of better transmission or retention.
Even a simple game of "telephone" (aka Chinese whispers) demonstrates the problems.
Michael Vnuk said,
October 12, 2025 @ 6:39 am
While I am not dismissing the possibility that some people can remember things accurately and that some material can be transmitted across many generations, reports of such recitations often focus on the fluency and confidence of the speaker and the detailed nature of the recitation, rather than the accuracy. For many events, we may never have a way of confirming their accuracy. It would be interesting to hear someone's recitation again a decade or two later to see how consistent it is.
Even for modern written memoirs, I have occasionally read reviewers praising the memory of the author, yet the reviewer often has no way to check accuracy, and seems to be relying only on the level of detail provided and the author's confident presentation.
David Marjanović said,
October 12, 2025 @ 7:12 am
Where can I learn more about the Hebridean sea-level rise story? I've only read of one from Australia.
Yes, but it has a history: the smoothing from [aw] to [ɔː] happened shortly before the oldest parts of the Veda, the "family songs" in the Rgveda (at least some of which are traditionally attributed to named authors), were composed.
Your interpretation, of course, is very old. It may go back all the way to that sound change. Regular sound change does sometimes change the meaning of onomatopoetic and sound-symbolic words: German has turned "going 'peep'" into pfeifen – and accordingly changed its meaning to "whistle".
This part I don't understand. It is precisely the computer that allows you to go back and edit your composition without having to type out the whole page again (and all following ones if editing changes the length of the text). As the saying goes, erst der Computer verdient es, "Schreibmaschine" genannt zu werden – nothing before the computer deserves to be called "writing-machine", which is what we call the typewriter.
Peter Grubtal said,
October 12, 2025 @ 9:07 am
Skepticism is appropriate when claims are made of oral history.
Serious analysis of its value is difficult to find, now that virtually every society is no longer preliterate, meaning that it can't be excluded that current narratives are contaminated by notions acquired (including very indirectly) from written material.
I find a detailed discussion in "Debating the Middle Ages – Issues and Reading" (Little and Rosenwein 1998) p. 29 and footnotes, which is highly skeptical, and quotes Yves Person, "Chronology and Oral Tradition" (1962), trans. Susan Sherwin, that in Africa folk memory had no long duration.
M. I. Finley in his discussions of the historicity of the Iliad quotes Milman Parry's work on orally transmitted Balkan epic poetry, which seems to get its history seriously wrong.
Andrew Usher said,
October 12, 2025 @ 3:48 pm
I think it is reasonable, given the evidence shown here, to conclude the traditional stories/myths can preserve memories for thousands of years. But not well – the embellishments outgrow the factual core, and we can separate the factual from the non-factual content only with knowledge external to the traditions themselves.
In the first example, granting it to be accurate, we can assume that the Klamath stories did preserve a memory of the volcanic eruption. But how could we? Only because of our knowledge of volcanoes in general, and our detachment from their culture that allowed us to critically analyse it. And even then, only the bare fact of the eruption was there – no detail, and no utility left. For that we had to rely on our science.
And how can we believe this is representative? How much oral tradition _doesn't_ preserve any historical facts beyond living memory? Surely orality as a whole can't be evaluated by picking out a few seemingly spectacular examples.
k_over_hbarc at yahoo.com
Michael Watts said,
October 12, 2025 @ 4:13 pm
What does this mean? Based on the English translations, it isn't obvious to me that the meaning of the word has shifted. "Peep" would refer to a sound made by a bird, and that sound can also be called "whistling".
AntC said,
October 12, 2025 @ 5:08 pm
Where can I learn more about the Hebridean sea-level rise story?
Maybe this is a folk-memory of the Storegga Slide? ~6,200 BCE is more a consequence of sea level rise/ice shelf melt. We know it inundated Doggerland, and that was occupied by humans. Had they reached Hebrides at that date?
Presumably Mackay's 'vivid' tales are collected in Carmina Gadelica, which you can find online, via wikip.
David Nash said,
October 12, 2025 @ 5:09 pm
Hiscock, Peter. 2019. Mysticism and reality in Aboriginal myth: Evolution and dynamism in Australian Aboriginal religion. Religion, Brain & Behavior 10.3,321–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1678515 * also available on http://www.researchgate.net
Peter Grubtal said,
October 13, 2025 @ 2:32 am
The Hebridean allusion above reminds me that the embellishment or downright invention of oral tradition has a long history.
The avid reception of the Ossian material also shows that, then as now, there is an eager market for stuff of this kind.
Accounts of oral tradition containing catastrophe scenarios, seem to crop up fairly often. The temptation to try to associate them with actual events is strong: It's alleged that a Black Sea flooding event could be reflected in the Noah and Gilgamesh stories, and I think some Armenian folk tradition.
Peter Grubtal said,
October 13, 2025 @ 2:44 am
@David Nash –
– many thanks for the reference: very germane!
David Marjanović said,
October 13, 2025 @ 4:16 am
The same birds? Pfeifen is hardly ever used of birds (or mice).
Oh, that makes a lot more sense, actually.
Philip Anderson said,
October 13, 2025 @ 7:11 am
@AntC
This article covers the Hebrides in particular:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jqs.3539
I can’t see that it covers archaeological remains, although there is evidence for Mesolithic inhabitants, but not necessarily permanent ones.
There are a number of Celtic stories about drowned lands, including the Breton city of Ys, Lyonesse in Cornwall and the Welsh Cantre Gwaelod. Visible drowned tree stumps may be brought up as evidence for the latter – “folk-memory” is not the only possible origin for some of these stories.
Michael Watts said,
October 13, 2025 @ 7:15 am
Which birds are the same birds? I said that the same sound could be referred to as peeping or whistling; presumably a single sound is made by just one bird.
Here's a birdsong video featuring sounds that I would be unsurprised to hear called "whistling". I might be a little more surprised to hear them called "peeping" because they are fairly continuous and my mental model of peeping is staccato. But I don't think they really differ from the sound of a peep.
(The video is 8 hours long, but listening from 0:05 to 0:20 is plenty.)
Philip Taylor said,
October 13, 2025 @ 2:10 pm
I would call that "whistling" — https://www.youtube.com/shorts/fMPgYAXbmYo I call "going 'peep peep'").
Andrew Usher said,
October 13, 2025 @ 8:47 pm
Peter Grubtal wrote:
Yes, and I think we can acknowledge that these may have an original basis in fact. But they are at so long a distance now that one can hardly tell; the end of the ice age was so long ago and Eurasian peoples have moved about so much since then. At some point the distinction between memory and myth fades out.
Michael Watts said,
October 14, 2025 @ 1:01 am
To harmonize with Andrew Usher, the mysticism in Australia over how we just know that aboriginal legends are accurate has bothered me for a long time.
In particular, I've seen it claimed that (a) the aborigines preserve the memory of a local volcano erupting; (b) we know that the last time it erupted was many thousands of years ago; (c) wooooooow.
But I've never seen an argument for how we know that the aboriginal legend refers to the local volcano, as opposed to, say, originating as a legend of the eruption of a volcano somewhere in the Pacific islands, and then being displaced onto a local volcano after the people stopped living in the Pacific islands.
Gokul Madhavan said,
October 14, 2025 @ 1:37 am
It’s worth distinguishing between two different things here: whether or not the content of the anecdote accurately represents the original event (I’d call this “veridicality”), and whether or not the anecdote has been transmitted accurately from generation to generation (I’d call this “fidelity”). There is no difference between oral and written traditions when it comes to veridicality, because that ultimately comes down to what people care to transmit to their succeeding generations. Writing seems to us to be higher-fidelity, but if the knowledge of the writing system is lost or disrupted, then this doesn’t hold any more. And anyone who has had the opportunity to deal with manuscripts and critical editions and the like knows that these too can be filled to the brim with infelicities. And writing traditions are also not immune to Gettier-style problems either.
In all cases, the specific structure of the intergenerational transmission system matters a great deal. Examples like the “telephone” game illustrate the fragility, not of oral traditions in general, but of single-chain transmissions without error-checking.
Philip Taylor said,
October 14, 2025 @ 3:14 am
Excellent analysis , Gokul — I concur with all the points that you make.
ajay said,
November 10, 2025 @ 8:20 am
In particular, I've seen it claimed that (a) the aborigines preserve the memory of a local volcano erupting; (b) we know that the last time it erupted was many thousands of years ago; (c) wooooooow.
But I've never seen an argument for how we know that the aboriginal legend refers to the local volcano, as opposed to, say, originating as a legend of the eruption of a volcano somewhere in the Pacific islands, and then being displaced onto a local volcano after the people stopped living in the Pacific islands.
I think this is a confused retelling of this story https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budj_Bim but your argument still requires that the local aboriginals must have known that the mountain in question was a volcano rather than just a hill, in order to displace their story onto it.
And since its last eruption was seven thousand years ago, that's still a pretty impressive time for the story to be preserved.
Or alternatively we have to assume that aboriginal Australians were good enough at geology to recognise a dormant volcano.
ajay said,
November 10, 2025 @ 8:34 am
I was also fascinated by this:
Such submergence stories were not true only of remote, exotic lands, but were also prevalent in locations closer to home, such as the Hebrides. "…Mary Mackay, the chief informant for the Hebridean stories, was clearly also loquacious, rendering her ‘vivid’ tales in ‘felicitous Gaelic’ according to Alexander Carmichael, the folklorist who collected them during the 1860s."
I've never come across these stories in the Hebrides – I wonder if they're recorded anywhere. But it does occur to me that the 1860s are pretty late, the Hebrides were distant but not isolated, and by that time Ice Ages and sea-level changes were certainly a topic of discussion among scientists – in particular in Scotland, where people like Chambers and Hutton had been laying the foundations of modern geology for some decades. I wouldn't be entirely surprised if Mary Mackay had based her vivid tales not on what her old granny told her but on a paper or two presented to the RSE.