No(t/n)
« previous post | next post »
That's bù 不, plus = a-, il-, im-, in-, ir-, un-, non- prefixes in English.
It can enter into Mandarin contractions, such as bù 不 ("not") + yòng 用 ("use") = béng ("needn't), and the two Sinoglyphs used to write the constituent morphosyllables can fuse to become béng 甭 ("needn't).
Here's a whole slew of such fusion words and contraction characters:
Ha, I've long been wanting to make a tweet about all those fantastic character combinations with 不: 甭、孬、歪、覔、 丕、奀… And now @edwardW2 dropped me these *amazing* dict. pages (from 海篇心鏡) with tons of those including funky ones like ⿳不成當 and ⿱不⿰安人! 😁 https://t.co/Va7JC3P1Js pic.twitter.com/y6ZeO0PR6W
— Egas Moniz-Bandeira ᠡᡤᠠᠰ ᠮᠣᠨᠢᠰ ᠪᠠᠨᡩ᠋ᠠᠶᠢᠷᠠ (@egasmb) September 30, 2023
Included among them are whimsical items such as one composed of bù 不 ("not") above and lǎo 老 ("old") below (= xiān 仙 ["ageless; immortal; transcendent"]), also another fairly well established one with bù 不 ("not") above and 好 ("good") below (= huài 壞 and other words / glyphs meaning "bad; evil; spoiled", etc.) — see if you can spot them.
See here for many other orthographic variants of xiān 仙 ("immortal; transcendent") of the former and this tweet.
You can very easily spend your whole life tracking down these weird characters into deep, dark holes. They are infinite in number.
Selected readings
- "Colloquial contractions in Mandarin" (5/9/16)
- "How many more Chinese characters are needed?" (10/25/)16
[Thanks to Geoff Wade]
Philip Taylor said,
October 5, 2023 @ 3:03 am
What, in what appears to be merely two pages of sinoglyphs, triggers "The following media includes potentially sensitive content", in the content between "books.google.com/books?id=1Q5aA" and "12:16 PM · Sep 30, 2023" ?
DBMG said,
October 5, 2023 @ 6:27 am
The algorithm probably thinks it might be bare tattooed skin.
bks said,
October 5, 2023 @ 6:50 am
Has "the algorithm … thinks" been discussed in LLOG?
Rodger Cunningham said,
October 5, 2023 @ 12:29 pm
It's an algorithm on the banks of denial.