Language Log

« previous post | next post »

In War on the Rocks (5/26/21), Tim Ball has an informative, thought-provoking article:  "Talking the Talk: Language Capabilities for U.S. Army Special Forces".  It begins:

In the mid-2000s, a series of U.S. Army Special Forces recruiting posters began appearing on Army installations across the country. One particular poster prompted more than a few eye rolls and laughs from the Special Forces community (commonly known as the Green Berets). The poster showed a Special Forces soldier conducting a military free-fall parachute jump. The caption stated, “The HALO [high altitude, low opening] jump wasn’t the hard part. Knowing which Arabic dialect to use when I landed was.”

From a recruiting standpoint, the poster hit all the marks. It took the excitement of a commando-style free-fall jump, combined it with the lesser-known expectation for a Green Beret to be a culturally adept warrior, and pushed it over the edge by portraying the jumper as a suave polyglot, capable of switching in and out of complex dialects at will.

In reality, most Green Berets aren’t fluent in the language assigned to them as they progress through the Special Forces Qualification Course. While they all achieve a basic standard in order to graduate from the course, most find it hard to become fluent in a second language, like most adults. For a command that describes itself as “the Nation’s Premier Partnership Force,” this raises an important question: How much language training and proficiency are enough for Army Special Forces?

If it's virtually impossible for members of the Special Forces to acquire the level of fluency that would be necessary for them to function freely in the areas where they operate, what policy should be adopted to cope with the problem?

The article is long and detailed; it could stand as a history of second language instruction in the Special Forces, which goes back nearly 70 years.  The question of second language competence has been a concern since the the very beginning.  Members of the Special Forces are required to maintain proficiency in the various languages which are assigned to them, and there are sophisticated training and testing policies to help ensure that they do.  The administration of the Special Forces also establishes incentives to encourage its members in the enhancement of their language skills.

Here's a key paragraph for gaining a realistic perspective on what is actually expected of a Green Beret in terms of second language competence:

Special Forces leadership also has to contend with other requirements besides language training. In order to link up with and train a partner force, Green Berets have to master basic combat skills while also perfecting advanced infiltration techniques. With a finite amount of time and resources to train before a deployment, Special Forces commanders have to carefully plan what tasks to train on and accept risk in certain areas. This applies to language training, where commanders have to decide how much is enough. This is exactly why higher special operations commands have set the standards currently in place. By doing so, they establish a baseline expectation for what a Green Beret needs to accomplish the mission, and this is deliberately short of fluency. The amount of time required to produce true fluency in a language would essentially eliminate most other training opportunities, leaving only a linguist with no way of getting to the battlefield and few skills to offer the partner force outside of a pleasant conversation.

In the course of his lengthy article, the author outlines numerous precise procedures for meeting the language needs of the Special Forces, one of which is the recruitment of native speakers who are fluent in the requisite languages and dialects.  The situation and its solution are summed up in his conclusion:

While the language capabilities of a Green Beret have varied over the years, proficiency in a foreign language is a skill that has received consistent attention from special operations leadership and remains a critical capability. It’s also one of the central elements to what differentiates U.S. Army Special Forces from other special operations units, due to the unique and varied mission sets required of Special Forces. Select Navy SEALs and Army Rangers receive language training as well but — unlike Green Berets — they aren’t spending 120 hours a year in the language lab on top of their other training.

Special Forces leadership has provided the resources, time, and funding to ensure language skills are sufficient for the majority of the mission sets facing today’s Green Berets. Given the current standards, every qualified Green Beret has the capability to engage with a partner force in their target language and build rapport. To expand this capability, Special Forces leadership should continue to seek out qualified native speakers from both within and outside the Army and aggressively recruit them for the Special Forces Assessment and Selection Course. If it does, then choosing the proper Arabic dialect after a military freefall jump could really be the hardest part about being a Green Beret.

Choosing the right Sinitic topolect would be even harder.

 

Selected readings

• "Special diligence: police and security forces in China" (4/14/18)
• "Multilingual cop" (5/4/09)
• "'Suffered We Protect They'" (12/22/14) — Chinese S.W.A.T. team
• "Learn Nepali" (12/21/16)
• "Warfighter" (11/25/12)
• "Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia" (3/17/10)
• "Retention bonuses for Arabic interpreters" (8/8/08)
• "Paramilitary" (10/16/17)
• "For want of a flack" (4/9/17)
• "SERE" (1/16/15)
• "A beachhead by any other name?" (11/8/20)
• "U.S. Army Special Forces 200 Hour Familiarization Courses" (5/14/16-12/21/18)

 

[Thanks to Barbara Phillips Long]

May 28, 2021 @ 2:58 pm · Filed by Victor Mair under Language and the military, Language teaching and learning

Permalink