How things have changed…
In today's Stone Soup, Val tries to catch up:
In today's Stone Soup, Val tries to catch up:
Once again, Zippy plays with English morphology. This time it's -ity day in Dingburg:
Today's Irregular Webcomic:
According to CGEL, that should be "Noun: the Gerund-participling".
[Hat tip: Paul Bickart]
This morning's comics page featured at least two strips focusing on Twitter as a literary genre. There was Doonesbury, in which Larry King demonstrates his command of the form:
And Pearls Before Swine, in which Rat edits Pig's copy of Leaves of Grass:
Several readers have recommended Wednesday's Non Sequitur:
Andrew Clegg asks "Is this true?"
Yesterday, most of the comments on The communicative properties of footwear dealt with the gender associations of the word cute. This linguistic stereotype is often used as the basis of comic-strip humor, frequently in the context of shopping, as in this Foxtrot strip from a few years ago:
And (with a twist) in this Preteena from 6/24/2009:
But in fact, the word cute really is used much more often by women than by men, in modern American culture.
Two Cathy strips on this topic that I've been saving up:
Weasel-speak, as featured in today's Tank McNamara:
There's clearly money in it — and quite a bit of training material out there.
When I tried to read Dilbert this morning, comics.com showed me this instead:
The latest xkcd is a brilliant way to introduce the topic of child language acquisition and cognitive development:
Today's Dilbert:
(Click on the image for a larger version.)
I'm not going to quibble about this one. Read the rest of this entry »