Archive for Linguistics in the comics

Linguists get tough on promoting language change

The latest xkcd, at

Comments off

Social change

Comments (34)

Outdorking word-dorks

Comments (24)

Creative overnegation

Today's Zits:

…plus the obligatory link to the Misnegation Archive.

Comments (4)

Assortative peeving

Girls With Slingshots for 12/23/2014:

Comments (20)


Frazz continues to explore vocabulary and its measurement:

Comments (1)

A tiny, delicate thesaurus

The latest Frazz:

Comments (1)

"… go all __ on you …"

Geoff Pullum wrote ("Adverbing, verbing, and adjectiving", 11/5/2014):

… for the most part what you get in the go all ____ on you [frame] is adjective-headed phrases …

While I hardly ever disagree with Geoff, my intuition said otherwise in this case, so I checked.

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (26)

Adverbing, verbing, and adjectiving

"I don't want to go all language nerd on you," says the female character in today's xkcd cartoon, "but I just legit adverbed 'legit', verbed 'adverb', and adjectived 'language nerd'." Is she correct?

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments off

Academic punctuation

Today's PhD Comics:

Comments (32)

Get the rope, Bill

It's been a while since we featured a Partially Clips comic — here's the most recent one:


Comments (20)

Nanook of the South

From the current New Yorker: has "more than 50" grits recipes (I count 64 on display), and there are lots more on other sites, so (costume aside) this is entirely region-appropriate. It's still linguistically naive, since the recipes have mostly-transparent phrasal names like "Raspberry Kielbasa over Cheese Grits"; but hey, it's a cartoon, and I guess the point is to mock those southerners with all their different approaches to grits, using the "Eskimo words for snow" trope as a vehicle.

Comments (12)

Plural data

Today's xkcd:

Mouseover title: "If you want to have more fun at the expense of language pedants, try developing an hypercorrection habit."

That should be "…developing another hypercorrection habit", since making data plural in that situation is exactly analogous to using whom in "Whom are you, anyways?". But then, as Ben Zimmer has pointed out to me, that would spoil the joke involved in the choice of an in "an hypercorrection".

Comments (37)