Spacing in Korean

« previous post |

The role of a Scotsman, John Ross (1842-1915), in creating it.  Although he was a Christian missionary who spent over half his life in China, he was apparently a gigachad.

The following video is densely packed with solid information and moves rapidly, so you have to pay close attention to follow it.

En masse / all things considered / by and large / for the most part/ generally speaking, etc., what is said here about Korean also applies to Chinese and Japanese.  Hanzi/kanji/hanjaphiles may not be happy to hear me say that.

See the candid comments by speakers of Chinese and Japanese.

And this from a Swedish speaker:

I'm Swedish and funnily enough, we have the same issues with spacing that Korean does. So much so that we even have a word for it, 'särskrivning' – roughly meaning 'writing separation'. Even funnier is the fact that the very word used to describe the error or adding spaces to compound words, is frequently also the victim of the phenomenon it describes. 'Särskrivningar' is the compound of 'sär-' – meaning separate or split – and 'skrivning' – meaning writing.

If only Peter Stephen Du Ponceau (1760-1844) had lived a century later, perhaps his preternaturally prescient understanding of the  Sinographic writing system would have had a synergetic, beneficial effect on the development of Chinese characters, as John Ross did on the Korean writing system.

 

Selected readings



2 Comments »

  1. 번하드 said,

    February 26, 2026 @ 7:18 pm

    Very glad that you liked that video, too, your post about spacing in Cantonese made me find it:-)

  2. Tom said,

    February 27, 2026 @ 6:29 am

    Following your link to "gigachad" was quite interesting. It is apparently based on a real person who looks fake. I've seen his visage multiple times before, but I had no idea a real person had a jaw like that.

    Based on Wiktionary's definition of gigachad, I think John Ross would not qualify. However, based on the way I've seen the term "chad" used before, I'd say Wiktionary is not quite accurate and your usage is closer to the normal one, which is something like hypermasculine, where that term implies "productivity" combined with "fearlessness", "independence".

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment