The Oldest (Known) Song Ever

« previous post | next post »

That's the title of a 9:23 video by a mysterious figure named Ming that was posted a month ago and that I happened upon several days later:

Most of the people to whom I showed this video said they thought that Ming has a robotic, AI-like quality ("an annoying cadence to his voice"). 

None of the Ancient Near Eastern specialists who viewed the video doubted the reality of the music, but there is no unanimity about how to reconstruct it.  There have been reconstructions of a Hurrian (language; people) song floating about for some time.

Specialists tell me that the video is generally correct, but has a number of small errors.

The graphics are good.

Sara de Rose:

Basically, the video has the facts right. Here's a Wikipedia article that describes the discovery and content of the specific Hurrian tablet (h.6 in the National Museum of Damascus).

The other two tablets the video mentions are CBS 10996 and UET VII 74, two tablets that I discuss in my Sino-Platonic paper.
 
Notice that in the "Notation" section of the Wiki article the first, third, fifth, seventh, etc. string pair numbers listed are 1-5, 2-6, 3-7, 4-1, 5-2, 6-3, 7-4. Notice furthermore that these are the same sequence of numbers listed in Table 2 on pg 20 of my Sino-Platonic paper, which gives the order of the shí’èr lǜ (lit., "12 pitches") as listed in the second paragraph of Chapter Six, “Tonal Pitch” of the Lǚshì chūnqiū (Master Lü's Spring and Autumn Annals).  I can show you how these numbers are embedded in the mathematics that generate the 12 notes that the octave is divided into, and also the familiar pattern of frets on the neck of a guitar. (This sequence of numbers is also on my patented music wheel.)
 
Each of these seven string pairs was given a name in Akkadian, and these names are listed alongside their related number pairs on both CBS 10996 and UET VII 74. The Hurrian tablet uses some of the Akkadian names, showing that the Babylonian musical system was in use as far away as Ugarit circa 1400 BCE.
 
The controversial thing is that, although we know the relationship between the two notes that make up each pair, we don't know if the notes were played together to make a rudimentary chord (re: Kilmer), or played one after the other (re: Dumbrill). Also, there is no definite way to reconstruct the rhythm of the song.  All that is really sure about the music is that it is written using Babylonian musical notation.

CBS 10996 is at the Penn Museum….and so is CBS 1766: the star tablet I got to hold. CBS 1766 also has the same sequence of numbers: 4, 1, 5, 2, 6, 3, 7…. Penn has at least one of the Sumerian lyres.

To me, all of this is hauntingly evocative, because much of the material evidence for this music that is more than three millennia old is sitting in the venerable Penn Museum, which is about four hundred steps from my office.

 

Selected readings

[Thanks to Phil Jones and Craig Melchert]



5 Comments »

  1. Philip Taylor said,

    October 25, 2025 @ 11:46 am

    I managed the first 20 second of the narration, after which I gave up. Almost as annoying as the woman narrating this afternoon's "Witches of Essex" programme on BBC Radio 4 who insisted on pronouncing "contagion" (/kɒn ˈteɪ dʒən/) as if it were spelled "contagen" (/ˈkɒn tə dʒən/). I could not work out what she meant by "contagen", so asked Google which kindly suggested "contagion".

  2. AntC said,

    October 25, 2025 @ 6:17 pm

    robotic, AI-like quality ("an annoying cadence to his voice")

    (I agree with @PT it's annoying.)

    It's supposedly a refined Australian accent. I suspect Ming is trying too hard and/or using some audio filtering. The Youtube site is a mish-mash of 'pop' topics, nothing else on Linguistics or Ancient History. I sampled a few other vids. There seems no more content than you can cull from wikipedia.

    To give Ming credit, the vid's more… Description does include links to Dumbrill's recreation 'H6 Hurrian song' performance by Sia "Australian singer". That is a lot easier on the ear.

  3. david said,

    October 25, 2025 @ 6:27 pm

    The youtube.com site list other earlier versions and has a transcript.

  4. AntC said,

    October 25, 2025 @ 7:08 pm

    Actually (talking of links), I suggest adding Richard Dumbrill to the post. There's an intriguing list of articles, including "Semitic Music Theory (2600-500 BC)" — wikip's link is broken, but the wayback machine seems to have the complete set of Dumbrill's articles.

    … rejects (Pythagorean) ditonism and heptatonism, as a model for Oriental music and particularly rejects the hypothesis of the use of dichords in the Musicology of the Ancient Near East.

    Dumbrill offers another interpretation of the Hurrian songs, the oldest music ever written, which was found in northwest Syria at the site of Ugarit.

    So a controversialist?

  5. Victor Mair said,

    October 25, 2025 @ 9:13 pm

    @AntC

    "rejects the hypothesis of the use of dichords in the Musicology of the Ancient Near East"

    Yes, that means he is specifically and strongly opposed to the theories of Anne Kilmer, which you can see from the penultimate paragraph from her that I quoted above.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment