Search Results
July 20, 2014 @ 10:19 am
· Filed under Language and culture, Language and music, Taboo vocabulary
Weird Al Yankovic's new song "Word Crimes" has generated a lot of heated discussion among linguists and other descriptivist types who didn't take kindly to its litany of language peeves — satire or no satire. (See my original post and Lauren Squires' guest post for extended commentary.) But in detailing various "word crimes," Weird Al […]
Permalink
October 31, 2013 @ 12:04 pm
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax, Usage advice
Anyone who loves language will surely cut a lot of slack for a magazine that will describe the Sunday Assemblies (increasingly popular non-religious Sunday gatherings of atheists in England) as "non-prophet organizations" (The Economist, 26 October 2013, p.34). It remains my favorite magazine, and its delicious puns are only part of the reason. But what […]
Permalink
December 6, 2012 @ 8:06 pm
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock, relative clauses, Syntax, Usage advice
I guess that if doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity, it is insane for me to imagine that I could do any good by telling the readers of The Chronicle of Higher Education that the rule banning which from restrictive relative clauses is "a […]
Permalink
December 4, 2012 @ 11:41 am
· Filed under Dialects, Language change, Language contact
A recent article in Science Daily has the headline `Linguist makes sensational claim: English is a Scandinavian language'. The claim in question is Jan Terje Faarlund's conclusion that `English is in reality a Scandinavian language' — that `Old English quite simply died out while Scandinavian survived, albeit strongly influenced of course by Old English.' The […]
Permalink
June 6, 2012 @ 3:47 am
· Filed under coordination, passives, Prescriptivist poppycock, Silliness, Usage advice, Writing
The Queen's English Society (QES), mentioned only a couple of times here on Language Log over the past few years, is no more. It has ceased to be. On the last day of this month they will ring down the curtain and it will join the choir invisible. It will be an ex-society. Said Rhea […]
Permalink
May 13, 2012 @ 11:00 am
· Filed under Humor
In her review of Henry Hitchings' The Language Wars: A History of Proper English, Joan Acocella expressed some annoyance that Hitchings could dare to suggest "that the “who”/“whom” distinction may be on its way out". As evidence that this distinction was already in some difficulty almost 20 years before Ms. Acocella was born, I reprint […]
Permalink
December 11, 2011 @ 3:44 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, Misnegation, negation
Once again on the Newt negation watch… In last night's Republican debate in Iowa, Gingrich defended his previous support of an individual mandate for health care insurance. He explained that he held this stance back in 1993, when he was combating so-called "Hillarycare": I frankly was floundering, trying to find a way to make sure […]
Permalink
August 8, 2011 @ 4:32 am
· Filed under Errors, Inflection, Language and the media, Morphology
It is traditional for readers of The Daily Telegraph to write letters to their editor saying how "appalled" they are by the terrible abuse the English language suffers daily. One little neologism, one split infinitive or other such stupid shibboleth that's easy to spot, and they're on it like wolves, excoriating the usage and protesting […]
Permalink
February 7, 2011 @ 10:09 am
· Filed under Syntax
Daniel Mahaffy points out an interesting phrase in President Obama's pre-Super Bowl interview with Bill O'Reilly: At about 7:21, the president says: That's saying to Americans, we're gonna each of us be responsible for our own health care. [Audio clip: view full post to listen]
Permalink
October 3, 2010 @ 7:00 am
· Filed under prepositions, Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax
John McIntyre notes on his blog You Don't Say that a man named Rod Gelatt, a retired professor of journalism who taught at the Missouri School of Journalism, writes in a letter to the Columbia Missourian newspaper (responding to an article calling for more attention to correcting grammar errors in online content): in the announcement […]
Permalink
September 25, 2010 @ 12:52 pm
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax
The misnamed "split infinitive" construction, where a modifier is placed immediately before the verb of an infinitival complement, has never been ungrammatical at any stage in the history of English, and no confident writer of English prose has any problems with it at all. (As the grammarian George O. Curme pointed out in 1930, it's […]
Permalink
August 17, 2010 @ 8:14 pm
· Filed under Obituaries
Today's New York Times has an obituary for James J. Kilpatrick ("James J. Kilpatrick, Conservative Voice, Dies at 89", by Richard Goldstein) that focuses, as the headline promises, on Kilpatrick's career as a conservative voice in newspaper columns, books, and television appearances. In passing, Goldstein mentions Kilpatrick's (often decidedly peevish) career as a critic of […]
Permalink
May 20, 2010 @ 1:13 pm
· Filed under relative clauses, Syntax, Usage advice
Jonathan Falk did a double-take, and quite rightly, when he saw this opening sentence in a recent article by Megan McArdle in the Business section of The Atlantic: Oddly enough, the New York Times health blog has an item on performance reviews, which suggests that they're probably a bad idea. Unh? They're saying that the […]
Permalink