Search Results
February 24, 2012 @ 12:16 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, passives
You're the prime minister of Australia. (Well, you're not, actually, but this is my little rhetorical way of plunging you imaginatively in medias res. I want you to imagine that you're the prime minister of Australia.) Your foreign minister is a former prime minister that you ousted from the leadership in 2010, and now a […]
Permalink
January 4, 2012 @ 12:11 pm
· Filed under passives
After so many posts by Geoff Pullum (ok, rants, but I agree with him!) about journalists who use the word "passive" without knowing what it means, it actually caught my eye just now to see "passive" used perfectly correctly! Has it come to this? Should I say "Congratulations to Nate Silver!"? Here it is: First, […]
Permalink
December 27, 2011 @ 4:29 pm
· Filed under passives, Syntax
Many have begged me to give up on my campaign to get journalists to stop using the term "passive" in its grammatical sense when they have no idea what it means. Some warn me that the quest is hopeless and no one will ever listen; some say I have failed to see that some sort […]
Permalink
July 18, 2011 @ 12:28 pm
· Filed under Language and the media, passives
AN EXTRAORDINARY SERIES of news revelations about "hacking" scandal in the Murdoch-owned tabloid press continues to amaze the UK public. There are bombshells exploding here in Britain every eight hours or so: an ex-editor and former government aide arrested; a whole newspaper permanently closed down on 48 hours' notice; news that CEO Rebekah Brooks' resignation […]
Permalink
February 22, 2011 @ 2:15 pm
· Filed under passives, Usage advice
"The BBC is a remarkable place", says Nigel Paine, the Head of People Development at the BBC, in his prefatory note to The BBC News Styleguide (2003); "Much of the accumulated knowledge and expertise locked in people’s heads stays that way: occasionally we share, and the result is a bit of a revelation." Paine is […]
Permalink
January 24, 2011 @ 7:00 am
· Filed under passives, Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax, Usage advice
Numerous Language Log posts by me, Mark Liberman, and Arnold Zwicky among others have been devoted to mocking people who denigrate the passive without being able to identify it (see this comprehensive list of Language Log posts about the passive). It is clear that some people think The bus blew up is in the passive; […]
Permalink
August 12, 2010 @ 4:25 am
· Filed under passives, Prescriptivist poppycock
An anonymous informant deep within corporate America ("I work at a large financial institution", he says guardedly) has seen the corporation's style guide for communications with customers, and its advice includes (guess what) this gem of cluelessness: Use active voice rather than passive voice. Active voice is easier to read. Instead of "we have decided," […]
Permalink
August 5, 2010 @ 5:58 am
· Filed under Language and politics, passives, Syntax
A commenter named bloix here on Language Log recently pointed out yet another case of passive allegations: First Read, a reliable purveyor of Beltway conventional wisdom, tries out the passive voice: "As for the media, we've allowed this story over race [to] bury one of the more consequential weeks of Obama's presidency thus far (the […]
Permalink
July 2, 2010 @ 5:50 pm
· Filed under Language and politics
Following up on my post "Rhetorical testosterone and analytical hallucinations" (7/1/2010), Linda Seebach sent a link to a column in which Mark Steyn complained about president Obama's "passivity" ("Obama's lazy tribute to Daniel Pearl", 5/21/2010): Like a lot of guys who've been told they're brilliant one time too often, President Obama gets a little lazy, […]
Permalink
March 24, 2010 @ 2:15 pm
· Filed under Language and politics
Language is changing at a torrid pace in China, and it's not just a massive infusion of English words that is to blame. Nor can we simply ascribe the dramatic changes in language usage to rampant, wild punning for the purpose of confusing the ubiquitous censors. Creative manipulation of lexical and grammatical constructions is another […]
Permalink
February 17, 2010 @ 9:09 am
· Filed under Linguistics in the comics
Yesterday's Dinosaur Comics explores the far reaches of verbal morphosyntax in English: (As usual, click on the image for a larger version.)
Permalink
November 4, 2009 @ 9:57 am
· Filed under Language and the law, passives, Syntax
Anita Krishnakumar posts at Concurring Opinions on November 2 about a Supreme Court judgment by Justice Anthony Kennedy that turned quite crucially on the distinction between active and passive voice in the language of criminal statutes, only (you're ahead of me already aren't you, Language Log readers?) Justice Kennedy doesn't know his passive from a […]
Permalink
June 25, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, passives
OK, I give up. I admit that I was wrong. I thought that the grammatical term passive had developed a spectrum of everyday meanings like "vague about agency", "listless writing, lacking in vigor", and "failure to take sides in a conflict". But I've now reluctantly concluded that for some members of the chattering classes, it […]
Permalink