Search Results
November 8, 2011 @ 4:53 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, passives, Syntax
People keep going on about the passive voice and revealing that they don't really know much about what it is. I have commented on this so often that some readers have written to beg me to stop. To the sensitive souls who just couldn't bear to be told one more time about a case of […]
Permalink
July 18, 2011 @ 12:28 pm
· Filed under Language and the media, passives
AN EXTRAORDINARY SERIES of news revelations about "hacking" scandal in the Murdoch-owned tabloid press continues to amaze the UK public. There are bombshells exploding here in Britain every eight hours or so: an ex-editor and former government aide arrested; a whole newspaper permanently closed down on 48 hours' notice; news that CEO Rebekah Brooks' resignation […]
Permalink
July 5, 2011 @ 4:55 am
· Filed under passives, Syntax, Usage advice
A web page about songs referring to God, pointed out to me by James Kabala, makes a critical remark about the grammar or style of one of the song titles: 11. New Order – 'Touched by the Hand of God' Though it's guilty of one of the most heinous journalistic crimes – that of 'passive […]
Permalink
April 19, 2011 @ 5:58 am
· Filed under Language and culture
Ardian Vehbiu wrote to draw my attention to a passage in Matthew Arnold's essay on Heinrich Heine: Philistinism! — we have not the expression in English. Perhaps we have not the word because we have so much of the thing. Ardian wrote "I found this quote counter-intuitive and funny. (I like the idea of the […]
Permalink
February 22, 2011 @ 2:15 pm
· Filed under passives, Usage advice
"The BBC is a remarkable place", says Nigel Paine, the Head of People Development at the BBC, in his prefatory note to The BBC News Styleguide (2003); "Much of the accumulated knowledge and expertise locked in people’s heads stays that way: occasionally we share, and the result is a bit of a revelation." Paine is […]
Permalink
February 12, 2011 @ 6:43 pm
· Filed under Language and politics
About a year ago I wrote a post entitled "Suicided: the adversative passive as a form of active resistance." This construction is still flourishing in China. Indeed, it is so ubiquitous nowadays as to have lost some of its edge. While not entirely banal, the frequent usage of the adversative passive has caused much of […]
Permalink
October 1, 2010 @ 12:17 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Obituaries
On September 30, 2010, a journalistic genre passed away: the mock obituary marking the purported demise of a linguistic phenomenon. According to the coroner's report, the cause of death was rampant overuse.
Permalink
August 12, 2010 @ 4:25 am
· Filed under passives, Prescriptivist poppycock
An anonymous informant deep within corporate America ("I work at a large financial institution", he says guardedly) has seen the corporation's style guide for communications with customers, and its advice includes (guess what) this gem of cluelessness: Use active voice rather than passive voice. Active voice is easier to read. Instead of "we have decided," […]
Permalink
August 5, 2010 @ 5:58 am
· Filed under Language and politics, passives, Syntax
A commenter named bloix here on Language Log recently pointed out yet another case of passive allegations: First Read, a reliable purveyor of Beltway conventional wisdom, tries out the passive voice: "As for the media, we've allowed this story over race [to] bury one of the more consequential weeks of Obama's presidency thus far (the […]
Permalink
July 23, 2010 @ 6:14 am
· Filed under passives, Syntax, Usage advice, Writing
Doostang is a job-search platform and advice service that, for a fee, will try to help you get a job. It provides on a blog such helpful things as tips on spicing up your resume. And one of the things it suggests is that you should avoid (are you ready for this, Language Log readers?) […]
Permalink
July 10, 2010 @ 12:10 am
· Filed under Language and politics
Charles Krauthammer has joined the chorus of pundits using presidential first-person pronouns to test the theory that a lie told often enough becomes the truth ("The selective modesty of Barack Obama", WaPo, 7/9/2010): It's fine to recognize the achievements of others and be non-chauvinistic about one's country. But Obama's modesty is curiously selective. When it […]
Permalink
July 4, 2010 @ 12:07 pm
· Filed under Language and politics, passives
I have completed a reanalysis of the verbs in President Obama's speech after the BP oil disaster, and can add a further note to Mark's analysis of Kathleen Parker's unbelievably irresponsible prattle about how the frequency of passive constructions chosen by his speechwriters shows that President Obama talks like a girl (is "suffering a rhetorical-testosterone […]
Permalink
July 2, 2010 @ 5:50 pm
· Filed under Language and politics
Following up on my post "Rhetorical testosterone and analytical hallucinations" (7/1/2010), Linda Seebach sent a link to a column in which Mark Steyn complained about president Obama's "passivity" ("Obama's lazy tribute to Daniel Pearl", 5/21/2010): Like a lot of guys who've been told they're brilliant one time too often, President Obama gets a little lazy, […]
Permalink