The growing expletive deficit at the White House

« previous post | next post »


If the expression is obscure to you, see:

"The number of fucks you need to not give" (2/11/2015)
"Hyperbolic scalar indifference" (7/14/2015)
"Expletive deficits" (7/18/2015)
"American politics: The pending expletive shortage" (8/30/2015)

There's also this.

But Donald Trump may already have bought the naming rights for that wing.

 

 



5 Comments

  1. D-AW said,

    September 8, 2015 @ 9:08 pm

    Has anyone commented on the mounting surplus of shits vis-a-vis fucks? These seem to have been not given in far greater numbers, historically, but seem to have been less not not given of late, to go by these reports.

  2. Rubrick said,

    September 8, 2015 @ 11:42 pm

    Will they plummet to the ground? Or are these flying fucks he's discarding?

  3. Ken Miner said,

    September 9, 2015 @ 7:08 am

    They plummet to the ground, like the bullets Mid-Easterners fire into the air to celebrate something. Oddly, no one ever complains.

  4. bratschegirl said,

    September 9, 2015 @ 12:55 pm

    Is one issued a single lifetime supply of fucks, or do we at some point pass go and collect 200 more? Does the meaning of not giving a fuck change, depending upon whether the individual does or does not have fucks remaining to give?

  5. mary apodaca said,

    September 13, 2015 @ 7:11 am

    Did you count "rhymes with bucket list?"

RSS feed for comments on this post