UM / UH update

« previous post | next post »

Nine years ago, I stumbled on an unexpected fact about the filled pauses UM and UH (“Young men talk like old women“, 11/6/2005). I found, as I expected, that older people tend to use UH more often than younger people do, and that males tend to use UH more than females. The surprising thing was that UM seemed to work in the opposite way, at least in the (large) American conversational-speech corpus that I looked at — younger people use UM more than older people, and females use UM more than males:

Last summer, some colleagues and I began a study of interviews with adolescents on the autism spectrum compared with neurotypical controls, and one of the features that we looked at was filled pause usage. We found a significant difference in UM vs. UH usage; and subsequently learned that some researchers from OGI had reported a similar finding in a poster at the 2014 International Meeting for Autism Research (“Fillers: Autism, gender, and age“, 7/30/2014).

A couple of weeks later, this came up in coffee-break conversation at the Methods in Dialectology meeting in Groningen, and a few of the people sitting around the table in the break room immediately pulled out their laptops and started looking at other datasets. To our surprise, we found essentially the same pattern in the Philadelphia Neighborhood Corpus, in the (spoken part of) the British National Corpus, in the Edinburgh-Glasgow Map Task Corpus, and in collections of Dutch, German, and Norwegian conversational speech. This work has continued (for a partial progress report, see “UM / UH in Norwegian“, 10/8/2014), and we hope to finish a journal paper on the topic over the holiday break. As part of the effort, I’ve looked a bit more closely at one of the datasets used in my 2005 post, and below I’ll show you a few of the resulting pictures.

The dataset in question is the Fisher English corpus, collected in 2003, comprising 11,699 telephone conversations. I’ve reduced this to the 19,753 call sides attributed to native speakers of English. In this dataset, filled pauses on average make up 1.7% of all 23,149,519 million words. UM and UH are the 18th and 19th commonest words, respectively; and added together, they would be the 12th commonest word, after I, you, and, it, the, that, ‘s, to, know, a, and yeah.

As the histogram on the right suggests, individual speakers show quite a wide of filled-pause rates, from 0% to more than 14%. And it shouldn’t be a surprise to see that filled-pause rate tends to increase with age, and that at every age, men tend to have higher rates than women:

The drop in rates for the highest age group — 75 to 85 — is statistically significant. It may be meaningful as well, perhaps because the selection process (or the demographics of surviving past 75) created a verbally-youthful sample. In any case, here are the counts behind the points in the plot, i.e. the number of speakers in each age range:

15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84
Women 1023  1789  1589  1117  482  133  25
 Men  1233  1204  790  570  236  84  30

However, UM and UH behave rather differently across the age range:

And as a result, there’s a gradual decrease in the proportion of filled pause that are UM:

While at every age, women use a higher proportion of UMs than men do:

And finally, if we look at rates of UM usage and UH usage separately for men and women of different ages, we see the following pattern:

So on average (at least in this dataset), men use UM and UH about equally often until about the age of 40, whereafter their rate of UH usage rises and their rate of UM usage falls.

In contrast, women use UM at a higher rate (than men) at all ages, with some indication of a drop at higher ages, while their use of UH increase steadily, from the 15-24 age bracket all the way up to 75-84, with apparent acceleration up to the 65-74 range.

There are many obvious questions. Is this a life-cycle effect, or a change in progress, or both? Is this limited to Germanic languages, or are there analogous things in other language families? Have the sex and age effects been inherited from proto-Germanic, or are they somehow ideophonically natural, or both? Given people’s propensity to form social stereotypes around small or even non-existent statistical differences, and the salience of age and sex as social dimensions, why do these differences (as far as we can tell) not rise to the level of conscious awareness?

You’ll find some discussion of these issues in earlier LLOG posts on this topic — see below for a chronological ist. We hope to do a better job in the joint paper in preparation.

Young men talk like old women“, 11/6/2005
Fillers: Autism, gender, age“, 7/30/2014
More on UM and UH“, 8/3/2014
UM UH 3“, 8/4/2014
Male and female word usage“, 8/7/2014
UM / UH geography“, 8/13/2014
Educational UM / UH“, 8/13/2014
UM / UH: Lifecycle effects vs. language change“, 8/15/2014
Filled pauses in Glasgow“, 8/17/2014
ER and ERM in the spoken BNC“, 8/18/2014
Um and uh in Dutch“, 9/16/2014
UM / UH in German“, 9/28/2014
Um, there’s timing information in Switchboard?“, 10/5/2014
Trending in the Media: Um, not exactly…“, 10/7/2014
UH / UM in Norwegian“, 10/8/2014
On thee-yuh fillers uh and um“, 11/11/2014
Labiality and feminity“, 12/16/2014
UM/UH accommodation“, 11/24/2015



3 Comments

  1. Coby Lubliner said,

    December 13, 2014 @ 8:25 pm

    I may have commented on this before, but there is a study of the eh/este distribution in (Puerto Rican) Spanish, with results that in some ways resemble those in Germanic.

  2. Trevor Stone said,

    December 13, 2014 @ 11:31 pm

    “why do these differences (as far as we can tell) not rise to the level of conscious awareness?”

    As a teenager in the 1990s, I remember hearing older folks complain about young people peppering their speech with “um.” It may have been motivated by teaching kids to use fewer verbal pauses, but definitely seemed stereotypical.

  3. Rakeb Ack Jr. said,

    December 16, 2014 @ 5:47 am

    I have to agree with Trever Stone here. My anecdotal evidence, also taken from teenage life in the 90s, was very similar. I’ve noticed that those same older people who used to chastise me for verbal interjections while thinking have increased that behavior as they’ve aged. I suppose I always attributed these pauses to my brain needing to catch up to my mouth. In a sense that makes sense for the aforementioned older people, as their brain functions decay over time, they need to interject more and more pauses into their speech.

RSS feed for comments on this post