Language Log

37 Comments

1. dw said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 7:55 am

   I'm a British native, and generally distinguish weak vowels (I have minimal pairs like "affect" and "effect"). However, my "versus" is a perfect homophone of "verses" (both end in /sɪz/), probably because I learned "versus" at a young age in the context of sporting contests. I think that every other Latin-derived word ending in "-us" has /əs/, except "Jesus" which has /əz/.

2. Pflaumbaum said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 8:40 am

   Exactly the same as dw, except re Jesus (or at least, the pronunciation of his name).

   I found myself trying to guess based on where the words sounded like they were positioned in the sentence, by virtue of their stress/intonation. A strategy which brought me a 50% success rate…

3. Bobbie said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 8:41 am

   I was listening for the /əz/ at the end to signify versEs for me. But it did not always work. My score reflects that.

4. Ellen K. said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 9:13 am

   I was thinking only of the verb verses, not the noun, and that verb isn't a part of my vocabulary, not even as something I hear. So I didn't judge any as sounding like verses. It was versus or either. And of the ones I judged as being "versus", I was wrong much more than I was right. And I don't think thinking of verses as a noun (as it was in most cases) would have helped me identify those as ambiguous.

   Basically, I expect versus to sometimes (and standardly) have /əz/ but verses to always have /ɪz/. And that would be true for the noun verses as well as the verb. Whether or not that actually reflects my speech I can't say, but, from the samples here, it's clearly not universal.

5. Ellen K. said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 9:15 am

   Just read Bobbie's comment and see her strategy was opposite to mine. :) (Not that I'd call it a strategy in my case.)

6. Jerry Friedman said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 9:21 am

   I haven't checked my score yet, but I won't be surprised if it was 50% or below.

   I thought there were several examples that I couldn't have told from [vice] versa. I wonder how people would do if they could hear the next syllable. I can see, though, that it could give a clue to whether we'd heard "verses" or "versus".

   I also wonder how people could do if they could listen to a sample of each person's speech, maybe one containing final /səs/ and /səz/, before hearing the word in question.

7. Dick Margulis said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 10:52 am

   A perfect 50%. Well, I guess my strategy failed (trying to differentiate based on voicing and length of final consonant).

8. Sevly said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 11:57 am

   Pflaumbaum said,
   I found myself trying to guess based on where the words sounded like they were positioned in the sentence, by virtue of their stress/intonation.

   Same here; I relied mostly on the intonation because, just as I suspected, I certainly couldn't tell the slightest difference in the sound of the last syllable, which gave me the stunning score of 55 percent.

9. Matt said,

   June 21, 2012 @ 12:32 pm

   If I pronounce them carefully, versus has a more central vowel than verses (which is a bit more front).

   If I don't pronounce them carefully they're pretty much identical for me, both with schwa.

10. Ellen K. said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 12:52 pm

    Bobbie: Do you mean /əz/ versus /ɪz/ or /əz/ versus /əs/? After reading Jerry Friedman's comment, it occurs to me maybe your strategy was not opposite to mine after all.

11. Craig said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 1:13 pm

    By the time I had listened to half the samples it was very clear to me that I couldn't even begin to tell them apart, and anything I said for any of them would be a total guess. I began with a strong impression that I pronounced the words differently myself, but as I test my pronunciation I am starting to doubt whether that is true — I think I say them both with -siz at the end in pretty much every situation, and any variation due to sentence position or surrounding words would affect both equally.

    I think this is one of those cases where the gut feeling that I am saying "different words" — i.e. that I'm accessing different files that are stored in different places in my brain — is fooling me into thinking I am pronouncing them differently. It feels different to say "verses" and "versus", so I assume it must sound different too.

12. Alex said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 1:48 pm

    IANAL(inguist), I just ran across this while looking up "feck".
    I missed only 5 (4, 6, 13, 15, 17), most of them seemed quite clear to me. I had no strategy, but I think there is information contained in how each sound bit is clipped.

13. rootlesscosmo said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 3:21 pm

    13 out of 20 right; no conscious strategy. I think I use a voiced s at the end of the one meaning "poems" and unvoiced for "against," but I haven't tried to test this belief.

14. The Ridger said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 3:35 pm

    @Craig: I think this is exactly what happens. It's why so many people don't think they say (for instance) 'rider' and 'writer' the same way. I certainly didn't, until a conversation with a friend over the movie 'Ghost Writer', which I accessed as 'Ghost Rider' despite knowing that she was talking about an indy/art-house festival, convinced us both that we can't tell them apart on hearing each other… which means we say them the same. If I had the verb 'to verse' I'm sure I would say 'verses' differently than I say the plural noun 'verses' but I strongly doubt it would be different from 'versus'.

15. Victoria Simmons said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 6:00 pm

    I had a 60% rate of success. The clipping of the sounds in the samples seemed to make a difference to me. I definitely pronounce the words differently, with verses /ɪz/ and versus /əs/. That may be because I'm a classics major who sometimes inadvertently re-latinizes anglicized words.

    I also tend to over-enunciate. On the other hand, I stress 'versus' differently in speech, hitting the first syllable harder and faster, and clipping the second syllable: almost vers's. That makes me anticipate hearing it that way, and so of the 8 samples I misidentified, 7 were a 'versus' I thought was 'verses.'

16. Eric P Smith said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 6:13 pm

    I’m Scottish, older, very traditionally brought up, introduced to Latin at a young age, and with a speak-as-you-spell tendency. I say 'versus' [ˈvɛɹsəs] with a final [s], 'verses' [ˈvɛɹsɪz].

17. rootlesscosmo said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 6:16 pm

    Born New York City 1942, lived Northern California since 1958, first language English. Married to an attorney who pronounces "versus" "vee."

18. Gordon Campbell said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 10:11 pm

    Born and raised in Australia. Nine out of twenty.

19. a said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 10:46 pm

    i think there some kind of weak correlation between stress and category — first syllable stress i think goes more with the noun verses, and no stress with preposition versus.

20. Tony said,

    June 21, 2012 @ 11:59 pm

    Well, as I confessed when I sent my guesses — I mean, answers — in, it's been made crystal clear that versus and verses are really hard to tell apart by ear.

    Obviously, I was wrong about the "quite distinct when written" part, too. It took all my powers of concentration to make sure I was typing the right word.

21. Eugene said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 4:44 am

    This nifty experiment confirms my intuition that these two words are pronounced the same in General North American English. The vowels are the same. If you wanted to make a distinction in careful pronunciation, the voicing/de-voicing of the final consonant would be the best strategy.

    Do we have minimal pairs based on vowel quality distinctions in unstressed syllables? My guess is that unstressed /ɪz/ and /əz/ are in free variation or are conditioned by their phonetic environments (i.e. not phonemic, no minimal pairs).

    From the comments you can see how strongly the writing system influences our phonetic judgements. We often believe that homophones are pronounced differently because we have an image of the written word in our minds. When you learn or teach IPA transcription, you see how strong that influence is.

    One last thought about 'writer' and 'rider' – they probably are pronounced the same (another experiment suggests itself) but I know how to pronounce them differently. The diphthong in 'rider' should be longer due to the lengthening rule that applies to vowels before voiced consonants. So, if the lengthening rule applied before the flapping rule, the two forms would be distinct. If the flapping rule applies first, it would cancel the lengthening rule and the two would sound the same.

22. Matt McIrvin said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 6:31 am

    I think I voice the final consonant in "verses" but not in "versus", and that that's the only difference. In a sentence spoken at normal conversational speed, that distinction would probably often vanish.

23. The Ridger said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 8:34 am

    I think a lot of people who don't have the verb 'to verse' are thinking of 'verses' as the noun. I would not pronounce the two words spelled 'verses' the same. The noun gets a Z, the verb an S. The same with, say, 'curse'. I'm quite willing to believe that distinction is more in my mind than my mouth, though.

24. Jerry Friedman said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 9:08 am

    @Eugene: I've heard of a demonstration where you lengthen or shorten a vowel (in the old days you spliced tape in or out) and change American "pick" to "pig" and vice-versa. See about halfway down here. Maybe someone who knows will comment.

    For those of us with Canadian Raising, the change in length affects the vowel quality, so I think my "writer" and "rider" are fairly distinct (and I have a minimal pair in "quire" and "choir"). However, I also think I have a minimal pair in "hearty" and "hardy", but listening to a recording of myself suggested that maybe you shouldn't trust me.

25. david waugh said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 11:24 am

    I am amazed to discover that there are people who don't pronounce versus and verses differently.

26. Victoria Simmons said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 3:20 pm

    @Ridger–

    I pronounces noun and verb of "verses" (not that I use it) and "curses" the same.

27. Mary Bull said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 4:09 pm

    I'm a native of coastal South Texas and have lived in Southern Kentucky and Middle Tennessee for over 60 years now.

    I got 10 examples wrong and 10 right.

    It was interesting to me that one of the examples I got wrong to my ear had "ar" as in "part" for the vowel, and I got this wrong by marking it "e" on account of hearing the final "s" pronounced as a "z" (to my ear). That was number 3. But I also heard the vowel in number 20 as "ar" and got it right by marking it "e," again on account of hearing the final "s" as a "z.'

    Fascinating experiment.

28. Mary Bull said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 4:13 pm

    Should have said "ar" as in "part" for the first vowel I wasn't distinguishing the second vowels at all — heard both as "schwa."

29. the other Mark P said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 7:10 pm

    I am amazed to discover that there are people who don't pronounce versus and verses differently.

    New to Language Log then?

    There are lots of posts here showing that people are wildly incorrect in their assessments of how differently they pronounce words. The only thing more sure is that some will refuse to believe it, no matter how much evidence.

    The only people I know who pronounce words like verses and versus differently in practice (as opposed to how they think they do it) are native speakers of languages without the schwa. They sound quite odd as they continue resolutely to pronounce the ends of words.

30. Eugene said,

    June 22, 2012 @ 8:22 pm

    I'm fairly sure that the plural rule and the 3rd Person Singular Present rule are the same. [əz] after sibilants, [s] after voiceless, [z] after voiced segments, so the noun/verb difference shouldn't matter.

    @Jerry Friedman. I have Canadian Raising, too, so I believe that 'writer/rider' are slightly different in length and quality for me as well. There might be a length distinction between 'latter/ladder.' I wouldn't bet a lot on it, though.

    I'm impressed with those who have recorded themselves to check their pronunciations – a very good attempt at being objective and you seem to have arrived at the correct result. There's still the possibility that you would produce a distinction for the recording that you wouldn't in normal production.

31. Ellen K. said,

    June 23, 2012 @ 12:12 am

    Eugene, I believe it's the first s, the ones also in verse and curse, where some people have a difference between the noun and the verb.

    For me they are the same, but an example with a voicing difference but no spelling difference is house. And this page has several words that have a voicing difference with also a spelling difference between the noun and verb forms.

32. Eugene said,

    June 25, 2012 @ 12:04 am

    Ellen K.,

    Most of the references were to a /səs/ and /səz/ voicing distinction. Merriam Webster transcribes 'versus' as /ˈvər-səs, -səz/. That seems like a plausible distinction to me, even though most of us don't preserve it.
    Voicing the first consonant would yield /ˈvərz/ and /ˈvər-zəz/, which doesn't sound plausible to me. I'd have to hear it to believe it. Anyway, nobody spelled or transcribed it that way in the preceding discussion.
    The thing about the noun/verb voicing pairs you link to is that they are old words that underwent the sound change long ago under the influence of suffixes that have since fallen out of use. I don't think we do that with newly derived verbs.

33. Ellen K. said,

    June 25, 2012 @ 6:50 am

    Yes, I'm aware of that, Eugene. But, when we talk about a voicing distinction between verses as a noun or a verb, we aren't talking about "versus" at all, which is neither. We are talking about something like the difference between proof and prove, though without the spelling difference, both the noun and the verb being spelling verse.

34. Piotr Gąsiorowski said,

    June 26, 2012 @ 1:14 pm

    English is my L2, with a British-type accent. I distinguish "versus" from "verses" consistently myself, though it doesn't surprise me they get merged in many accents. My score in the test was 6 wrong (4, 5, 6, 11, 13, 18) "verses" 14 right. There is a clear bias in the results: in the cases where I was wrong, I nearly always heard intended "verses" as "versus" rather than the other way round. When listening to the recordings, I paid less attention to the colour of the unstressed vowel than to the relative duration of the two syllables (the clipping effect of /s/ in "versus").

35. Piotr Gąsiorowski said,

    June 26, 2012 @ 2:25 pm

    I wrote: I nearly always heard intended "verses" as "versus" rather than the other way round.

    Oops, actually, it WAS the other way round. I heard "verses" where "versus" was intended.

36. Mel Nicholson said,

    June 26, 2012 @ 9:53 pm

    @Jerry Friedmann I haven't worked with pig/pick in particular, but I can report that ladder and latter differed primarily by the duration of the /æ/ in a series of experiments in 1989 with 20-25 year old subjects in the U.C.Berkeley area, all of whom had some flavor of US-English as a dialect. It was only about a 12ms variation in length, so this isn't like gemination in other languages. Correct identification rates for naturally produced examples were well over 90%. The artificial ones were lower, but not by a statistically significant amount (given 11 subjects and ~20 examples)

37. Eugene said,

    June 27, 2012 @ 4:42 am

    Mel makes a good point about vowel duration. Even though the difference was relatively small, correct identifications averaged 90%. So you can conclude that we have a minimal pair for vowel length between latter and ladder. In any comparison of minimal pairs, you'd expect a rate of identification close to 100%.

RSS feed for comments on this post

• Follow us on Twitter




Archives [+/–]

• • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008


• [Posts before 4/8/2008 are here]
  [Search old posts here]
  
  



Blogroll [+/–]

• • "Spoken language expert’s exuberant life of science"
  • …And read all over
  • A Linguist Goes to Law School
  • A Roguish Chrestomathy
  • A Walk in the WoRds
  • A Way With Words
  • Abecedaria
  • Alex's phonetic thoughts
  • All Things Linguistic
  • Anggarrgoon
  • Archival Sounds (British Library)
  • Arrant Pedantry
  • Ask the League of Nerds
  • Babel's Dawn (Edmund Blair Bolles)
  • Bad Language
  • BadLinguistics (Pauline Foster)
  • Between the Lines with Edwin Battistella
  • Blogamundo
  • Bradshaw of the Future
  • Bremer sprachblog
  • Building Rapport
  • Bulbulovo
  • Career Linguist
  • Child's Play
  • Citizen sociolinguistics
  • clinicallinguistics
  • Coby Lubliner's Blog
  • Cognition And Language Lab
  • Colorless Green Ideas
  • Conjugate Visits
  • DCblog (David Crystal)
  • Degelka af soomaaliga
  • Descriptively Adequate
  • dialect blog
  • Dictionary Evangelist
  • Dictionary Society of North America
  • Double-Tongued Dictionary
  • Ed Absurdum
  • Eggcorn Database
  • Endangered Languages and Cultures
  • English, Jack
  • Epea Pteroenta
  • Eternally Stressed Semanticist
  • Everything You Know About English Is Wrong
  • Evolving English
  • Far Outliers
  • Found in Translation
  • Freemorpheme
  • Fritinancy
  • Fully (sic)
  • Good Reason
  • Gordon P. Hemsley
  • Greater Blogazonia
  • Hanzi Smatter 一知半解
  • Harmless Drudgery
  • HeadsUp: The Blog
  • https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/spoken-language-expert-s-exuberant-life-of-science-20220916-p5birk.html
  • Idibon
  • Isabella Massardo Copy & Translation
  • Jabal al-Lughat
  • John Wells's Phonetic Blog
  • Johnson
  • JoshMillard.com
  • Keywords
  • Langguj Gel
  • Language Evolution
  • Language Geek
  • Language Hat
  • Language Is The People's
  • Language Jones
  • Language Trainers Blog
  • Language: A Feminist Guide
  • Lathophobic Aphasia
  • LAWnLinguistics
  • LGSA Fledgelings
  • Lingformant
  • Lingua Franca
  • Linguaphiles
  • Linguism
  • Linguistics Anonymous
  • Linguistrix
  • Literal-Minded
  • Living Languages
  • Logomacy
  • Logophilius
  • Making Noise and Hearing Things
  • Matjjin-nehen
  • Mental Floss (language section)
  • Metrolingua
  • Michael Erard
  • Motivated Grammar
  • Mr. Verb
  • Naked Translations
  • Natural Language Processing Blog
  • No-sword
  • Noncompositional
  • NPR code switch
  • Office Natural Language Team Blog
  • Omniglot – The Blog
  • Oxford Etymologist
  • Ozarque's Journal
  • Paleoglot
  • Paperpools
  • Peter Harvey, Linguist
  • phonoloblog
  • Pinyin News
  • Podictionary
  • Polyglot Conspiracy
  • Polyglot Vegetarian
  • Polysyllabic (Karl Hagen)
  • Popular Linguistics
  • Proper Words in Proper Places
  • Replicated Typo
  • Ryan's linguistics blog
  • Sauvage Noble
  • Schnaufblog
  • Sentence First
  • Separated by a Common Language
  • Sesquiotica (James Harbeck)
  • SLA Blog
  • Strong Language
  • Stæfcræft & Vyākaraṇa
  • Superlinguo
  • Talk Wordy to Me
  • Talking Brains
  • Technologies du Langage
  • Tenser, said the Tensor
  • That Munanga Linguist
  • ThatWhichMatter
  • The Babbel Blog
  • The Diacritics
  • The Engine Room
  • The Greenbelt
  • The Ideophone
  • The Language Guy
  • The Lexicographer's Rules
  • The Ling Space
  • The Lingua FIle
  • The Lousy Linguist
  • The mashed radish
  • The Ramblings of a Proto-linguist
  • The Stone and the Shell
  • The Virtual Linguist
  • The Visual Linguist
  • The Web of Language
  • The Zero Morpheme
  • Throw Grammar From the Train
  • Transblawg
  • Transient Languages & Cultures
  • Translate This!
  • Val Systems
  • Vocalized/Vocalised (Lauren Hall-Lew)
  • Web-Translations
  • Wishydig
  • Word Jazz
  • Word Journal
  • Word Porn
  • Word Routes
  • Wordlustitude
  • Wordnik blog
  • Words Are Delicious
  • Words from Sweden
  • Words to the Wise
  • You Don't Say




• Meta

  • Log in
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • WordPress

Powered By WordPress