Search Results
June 25, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
· Filed under passives
On her blog, Elizabeth Daingerfield Zwicky reports an encounter between her daughter Opal (now 5) and the passive voice: Jun 23, 2009 Our worst moments today came with the best language. This morning Opal did not get to open the garage door, after an interaction she found unfair, and while she howled with fury I […]
Permalink
June 23, 2009 @ 7:36 am
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, Language change
We've noted, more than once, that the grammatical meaning of "passive voice" is pretty much dead in popular usage, while the ordinary-language meaning, struggling to be born, remains inchoate, a sludgy mixture of dessicated grammatical residues and vaguely sexualized associative goo. Sometimes passive voice is used to mean "vague about who's at fault", which seems […]
Permalink
June 17, 2009 @ 6:23 am
· Filed under Linguistics in the comics
9 Chickweed Lane, for June 15, illustrates something about prescriptivist pain:
Permalink
June 12, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
· Filed under Language and the law, Prescriptivist poppycock
People have begun to ask why Language Log hasn't yet commented on the remarks of Sonia Sotomayor about the sterling value of (you guessed it) Strunk & White. One recent commenter (here) actually seems to imply that we have jumped all over Charles Krauthammer solely because he is conservative, and shielded Sotomayor from criticism because […]
Permalink
June 10, 2009 @ 6:59 am
· Filed under Ignorance of linguistics, passives, Syntax
A few days ago, Geoff Pullum posted a meditation on the role of The Elements of Style in befuddling Americans about the nature of the passive voice ("Drinking the Strunkian Kool-Aid: victims of page 18", 6/6/2009). His point of departure was a passage illustrating the confusion, taken from a 2007 article by Ada Brunstein ("The […]
Permalink
June 6, 2009 @ 12:02 pm
· Filed under passives, Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax
"My toothbrush is one of four standing upright in a cup on the bathroom sink," wrote Ada Brunstein in ‘The House of No Personal Pronouns’, a 2007 piece in the New York Times Fashion & Style section. "These toothbrushes belong to me, my boyfriend, his wife and her lover." Brunstein often stays at the house […]
Permalink
April 22, 2009 @ 6:46 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
Poor Sam Roberts. He begins his New York Times article "'The Elements of Style' turns 50" (April 21) thus: How does a professional writer discuss "The Elements of Style" without nervously looking over his shoulder and seeing Will Strunk and E. B. White (or thousands of readers of their book) second-guessing him? (Is "second-guessing" hyphenated […]
Permalink
April 17, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
· Filed under Language and culture
Even jezebel.com is getting into the S&W 50th anniversary act (Sadie, "Stylistas", 4/16/2009): The Elements of Style, Strunk and White's timeless usage and composition handbook, is 50 today. Please place a preposition after the relative pronoun in its honor. I applaud this attempt to re-purpose words that have otherwise lost their meaning in popular culture, […]
Permalink
March 18, 2009 @ 9:20 am
· Filed under Language and politics
Edward Liddy chose, bizarrely, to start the third paragraph of his Op-Ed piece in today's WaPo ("Our Mission at AIG: Repairs, and Repayment") with a classical allusion: Mistakes were made at AIG, and on a scale that few could have imagined possible. The most egregious of those began in 1987, when the company strayed from […]
Permalink
January 11, 2009 @ 9:23 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
Among the 39 comments on David Beaver's post "Orwell's Liar", comments that were often impassioned and mostly long, the best one was calm and short: Joseph Williams makes related points in his influential article, "The Phenomenology of Error," published in College Composition and Communication in 1981. That essay has an unforgettable surprise ending. You can […]
Permalink
November 18, 2008 @ 1:18 pm
· Filed under Language and politics
Mark struggles to maintain some sort of balance to counter the amateur linguistics we see in the press concerning the language used by political figures, even to the extent of trying to defend Sarah Palin's often incoherent public pronouncements. But I think she'll continue to outflank him. Here's a recent quote, from the Larry King […]
Permalink
October 3, 2008 @ 11:33 am
· Filed under Uncategorized
In the 13 September NewScientist's "Feedback" column: a note beginning "There should be a law against it, we grumble", with a report that back in June Reuters distributed a story on the Japanese company Genepax, which claims to have produced a car that runs on "nothing but water". The magazine noted that the claim has […]
Permalink
September 10, 2008 @ 8:29 am
· Filed under Language and the media
What is spin? According to the OED's 1993 additions, 2. g. fig. A bias or slant on information, intended to create a favourable impression when it is presented to the public … What is SpinSpotter? According to Claire Cain Miller in the NYT ("Start-Up Attacks Media Bias, One Phrase at a Time", 9/8/2008), it's a […]
Permalink