Search Results
August 13, 2018 @ 7:31 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Lexicon and lexicography
Rachel Paige King ("The Draconian Dictionary Is Back", The Atlantic 8/5/2018) suggests that lexicographers might be (re)turning to prescriptivism: Since the 1960s, the reference book has cataloged how people actually use language, not how they should. That might be changing. […] The standard way of describing these two approaches in lexicography is to call them […]
Permalink
April 26, 2018 @ 11:48 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Language reform, Prescriptivist non-poppycock, Prescriptivist poppycock, Usage
From Lane Greene at The Economist, "The ban on split infinitives is an idea whose time never came," with boldfacing by yours truly: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW was once so angry with a subeditor that he complained to the newspaper. “I ask you, sir,” Shaw wrote, “to put this man out.” The cause of his fury? […]
Permalink
December 8, 2017 @ 5:16 am
· Filed under Computational linguistics, Grammar, Information technology, Language and the media, Usage advice
In today's Dilbert strip, Dilbert is confused by why the company mission statement looks so different, and Alice diagnoses what's happened: the Elbonian virus that has been corrupting the company's computer systems has fixed all the grammar and punctuation errors it formerly contained. That'll be the day. Right now, computational linguists with an unlimited budget […]
Permalink
April 23, 2017 @ 4:24 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Prescriptivist poppycock, Silliness, Syntax, Usage advice
Last January 21 The Economist actually printed a letter I wrote pointing out that how wirelessly to hack a car was a ridiculous way to say "how to wirelessly hack a car," and resulted from a perverted and dimwitted obeisance to a zombie rule. But did they actually listen, and think about changing their ways? […]
Permalink
January 23, 2017 @ 9:09 am
· Filed under Language and the media, Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax, Usage
As of the time of writing, you only get one hit if you ask Google to show you all the pages on the web containing the word sequence in order legally to minimise. That lone hit leads you to an anonymous leader in The Times (there is a paywall) in which this sentence occurs: Companies […]
Permalink
January 12, 2017 @ 3:21 am
· Filed under Uncategorized
As Mark Liberman has often reminded us, when taking things from newspapers you have to be very careful about what to attribute to the person who allegedly said something and what to attribute to the journalist who reported it or the subeditor who futzed with what the journalist turned in. So when we read this […]
Permalink
December 28, 2016 @ 3:35 am
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock, Silliness, Style and register, Syntax
You don't think the ridiculous split-infinitive avoidance contortions at my favorite magazine could have started being exaggerated just as a sort of private joke on me, do you? I have reported many times on the absurd syntax that The Economist is prepared to countenance rather than ignore its cowardly advice of its style guide ("The […]
Permalink
September 28, 2016 @ 8:55 am
· Filed under Grammar, Prescriptivist poppycock, Syntax, Writing
The Economist, in a leader last April about the Panama Papers revelation, which I really should have brought to your attention sooner (it fell through the cracks of my life), told us that "The daughters of Azerbaijan's president appear secretly to control gold mines." They appear secretly? Where are these secret appearances? Are they scheduled in […]
Permalink
June 12, 2016 @ 7:13 am
· Filed under Language and sports
Today's SMBC: Mouseover title: "Life rule: Never do anything you've done more than 3 times already."
Permalink
May 20, 2016 @ 8:43 am
· Filed under Language reform, Writing systems
This morning I was awakened by a bird calling outside my window, "m*ll*n*y m*l*rk*y", or maybe it was some squirrel chattering (I was half asleep and couldn't be sure which it was). Since I was unable to distinguish the vowels clearly, I couldn't tell exactly what the call / chatter was, but the bird / […]
Permalink
May 8, 2016 @ 9:25 am
· Filed under Computational linguistics, Usage, Variation
The publisher's blurb for the fourth edition of Garner's Modern English Usage introduces a new feature: With more than a thousand new entries and more than 2,300 word-frequency ratios, the magisterial fourth edition of this book — now renamed Garner's Modern English Usage (GMEU)-reflects usage lexicography at its finest. […] The judgments here are backed up […]
Permalink
December 23, 2015 @ 7:30 am
· Filed under Errors, Language and the media, Prescriptivist poppycock, Silliness, Usage advice, Writing
There is a designated staff member whose job at The Economist is to make the magazine (my favorite magazine) look ridiculous by moving adverbs to unacceptably silly positions in the sentence. She is still at work. This is from the December 12 issue, p. 58, in an article about preparations for a referendum next year on […]
Permalink
September 4, 2015 @ 4:39 am
· Filed under Language and the media, prepositions, Prescriptivist poppycock, Style and register, Syntax
My favorite magazine is deliberately trying to annoy me. In the August 22 issue of The Economist there's a feature article about the composition of the universe (dark matter, dark energy, and all that, with a beautiful diagram showing the astoundingly tiny fraction of the material in the cosmos that includes non-dark non-hydrogen non-helium entities […]
Permalink