Search Results
June 1, 2014 @ 5:45 am
· Filed under Semantics, Syntax
Lauren Collins, "Haiku Herman", New Yorker 3/31/2014: When asked later about the role that poetry had played in Kiev's Independence Square — protesters waved portraits of the nineteenth-century poet Taras Shevchenko — Van Rompuy said, "I wouldn't be surprised if this struggle and this tragedy had not inspired people there." Sometimes, as in that example, […]
Permalink
April 26, 2014 @ 6:56 am
· Filed under Lost in translation
Fans of LL's Lost in Translation feature will enjoy the Facebook group Traductions de merde ("Shitty translations"), and a collection of the "Top 40 des traductions de merde" at topito.com. For example, there's an echo of the famous "Translate server error" signs:
Permalink
April 6, 2014 @ 8:55 pm
· Filed under Language and culture
Under the heading Freedom 2014, "Whether it’s freedom from surveillance or freedom to be single, this spring the BBC is investigating what freedom means in the modern world". One of the BBC's own contributions to #Freedom2014 is a lovely addition to our No Word For X archive: The Inuit language doesn't have a word for freedom, the closest […]
Permalink
January 10, 2014 @ 9:36 am
· Filed under Linguistic history
The American Dialect Society chose because as its Word Of The Year, and thereby provoked an argument, here and elsewhere, about parts of speech. Most dictionaries and grammars see words like for, in, since, etc. as variously prepositions, adverbs, conjunctions, or particles, depending on how they're used. Geoff Pullum argues that they're all always prepositions, […]
Permalink
September 28, 2013 @ 6:34 am
· Filed under Language and literature
This is a guest post by Bill Benzon, in response to earlier posts by Hannah Alpert-Abrams and Dan Garrette ("Computational linguistics and literary scholarship", 9/12/2013) and David Bamman ("On Interdisciplinary Collaboration and "Latent Personas"", 9/17/2013).
Permalink
July 25, 2013 @ 2:05 pm
· Filed under Prescriptivist poppycock
Email from reader J.M.: As I was perusing LL this afternoon, the title of a post you wrote caught my attention: "Metaphors which you are used to seeing in print". I know that the that/which distinction is becoming less and less distinct, but I still thought it was generally practiced in academia (I am not […]
Permalink
December 10, 2012 @ 4:33 am
· Filed under Linguistic history, Usage advice, Variation
On both sides of the War of the Iptivists, many people seem to believe that opinions about linguistic usage reflect attitudes towards innovation. The story goes like this: A new word, a new form, or a new construction is invented; at first, most people reject the innovation and deprecate the innovators; but the innovation spreads all the […]
Permalink
December 4, 2012 @ 11:41 am
· Filed under Dialects, Language change, Language contact
A recent article in Science Daily has the headline `Linguist makes sensational claim: English is a Scandinavian language'. The claim in question is Jan Terje Faarlund's conclusion that `English is in reality a Scandinavian language' — that `Old English quite simply died out while Scandinavian survived, albeit strongly influenced of course by Old English.' The […]
Permalink
June 16, 2012 @ 1:42 pm
· Filed under Language and culture, Multilingualism
I spent much of the past couple of weeks back in my childhood city of Montreal. It was an eventful time. Thousands of student demonstrators marched past the restaurant where I was having dinner, banging on pots and pans. The partial remains of a dismembered Chinese student were found not far from where my brother […]
Permalink
November 7, 2011 @ 6:52 am
· Filed under Language and culture, Rhetoric
Last Friday, I heard Sarah-Jane Leslie talk about "Generics and Generalization": Generic sentences express generalizations about kinds, such as "tigers are striped", "ducks lay eggs", and "ticks carry Lyme disease". I present and review emerging evidence from adults and children that suggests that generics articulate cognitively default generalizations — i.e., they express basic, early-developing inductive generalizations […]
Permalink
September 24, 2011 @ 2:34 pm
· Filed under WTF
David Starr Jordan, among other accomplishments, was president of Stanford University from 1891 to 1913, and then chancellor of Stanford until 1916. He was also director of the Sierra Club from 1892 to 1903. He chose Stanford's motto, "Die Luft der Freiheit weht" ("The winds of freedom blow"). Stanford's Jordan Hall is named for him, […]
Permalink
August 28, 2011 @ 6:47 am
· Filed under Language and politics, Linguistics in the news, Sociolinguistics, Words words words
To answer the many critics of his "whites have become black" diatribe, the Tudor historian and obnoxious TV personality David Starkey published an article in The Telegraph on August 19 defending his stance on the way Jamaican linguistic patterns are allegedly implicated in the cause of the English riots. The linguistically relevant point is that […]
Permalink
August 16, 2011 @ 6:36 pm
· Filed under Dialects, Language and politics, Language and the media, Language contact
We've had Geoff Pullum's response to "David Starkey on rioting and Jamaican languages" (here): a suitably outraged reaction to Starkey's amazingly ignorant ravings on language, race, and culture in the recent British riots (it's all the fault of Jamaican Creole!). Now, from the ironic wing of the creolist world, the following response by Peter Trudgill […]
Permalink