{"id":53900,"date":"2022-03-09T05:27:48","date_gmt":"2022-03-09T10:27:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=53900"},"modified":"2022-03-09T05:31:20","modified_gmt":"2022-03-09T10:31:20","slug":"arabic-and-the-vernaculars-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=53900","title":{"rendered":"Arabic and the vernaculars, part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"

For Arabic diglossia references, see the works of Mohamed Maamouri<\/a>, e.g., here<\/a>, here<\/a>, here<\/a>, here<\/a>, here<\/a>, here<\/a>, and here<\/a> (pdf).<\/p>\r\n

Also consult the various Arabic datasets of the LDC<\/a> (Linguistic Data Consortium<\/a>), both MSA and colloquial.<\/div>\r\n
\u00a0<\/div>\r\n
An important point to make is that the regional Arabic \"colloquials\" have been developing in separate directions nearly as long as the regional Romance varieties have. So Moroccan Arabic is roughly as different from Gulf Arabic as (say) French is from Portuguese….<\/div>\r\n

<\/p>\r\n

You can get a list of LDC Arabic datasets by searching the catalog page<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

But here's a replication of the results<\/a>:<\/div>\r\n

More TK.<\/p>\r\n

 <\/p>\r\n

Selected readings<\/b><\/p>\r\n