{"id":21224,"date":"2015-09-14T07:29:33","date_gmt":"2015-09-14T12:29:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=21224"},"modified":"2015-09-15T03:24:02","modified_gmt":"2015-09-15T08:24:02","slug":"raw-cyber-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=21224","title":{"rendered":"Raw \"cyber\" information"},"content":{"rendered":"

A recent xkcd<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Mouseover title: \"We had gathered that raw information, but had yet to put it all together.\"
\n<\/p>\n

Hate to spoil the joke, but Google Scholar finds 452 publications on cyberintelligence since 2014<\/a>; 8,330 publications on cybersecurity in the same period<\/a>; and 30,200 publications using the bare lexeme cyber<\/strong><\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Google Books ngrams won't track past 2008, and suggests a leveling off around 2004, but clearly the graph didn't go to 0 in 2005<\/a>:<\/p>\n