Search Results
October 18, 2018 @ 6:42 am
· Filed under Language and culture
In "Lexico-cultural decay?", 10/9/2018, I called into question Jonathan Merritt's evidence for the view that "most of the central terms in the Christian vocabulary are rapidly declining". Merritt cites Kesebir & Kesebir 2012, who argue on the basis of Google ngram-viewer data that Study 1 showed a decline in the use of general moral terms […]
Permalink
December 16, 2010 @ 9:03 pm
· Filed under Computational linguistics
In Science today, there's yesterday, there was an article called "Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books" [subscription required] by at least twelve authors (eleven individuals, plus "the Google Books team"), which reports on some exercises in quantitative research performed on what is by far the largest corpus ever assembled for humanities and […]
Permalink
December 7, 2009 @ 2:00 am
· Filed under Language and politics, Language and the media
They're getting to be routine, Mark's virtuoso skewerings of those who Google widely but not well — in the post below, taking on James Delingpole's effort to demonstrate that the Climategate story is undercovered by the MSM by showing that the number of Google hits for the phrase is disproportionate to the news stories about […]
Permalink
July 11, 2009 @ 12:22 am
· Filed under Humor, Linguistics in the news, Pragmatics
A casual inspection of the 59 (true) Google hits on "Oooo, you look", suggests that Dr. Willis Jensen, a recent presenter in the brownbag lunch series at Language Log Plaza, vastly overestimated the correlation between utterance initial "Oooo" and sarcasm: the true rate is less than 50%. However, he is correct to identify "Oooo" as a common […]
Permalink
May 15, 2010 @ 12:10 pm
· Filed under Names
Richard Smith, a 41-year-old care worker in Carlisle, England, did not think his name did justice to the exciting person that he actually was, so he changed his name by deed poll. The new name he chose was Stormhammer Deathclaw Firebrand.
Permalink
July 27, 2023 @ 7:01 am
· Filed under Language and history
The recent controversy about Florida's new State Academic Standards for Social Studies leaves something out, in my opinion. The point of contention is the assertion (p.6) that "Instruction includes how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit". Critics have taken this as an inappropriate pitch for the benefits […]
Permalink
November 6, 2022 @ 8:18 am
· Filed under Usage
A few days ago, G.W. sent a question about this tweet: Remember—Biden tried to fire essentially every worker who didn't take the COVID vaccine. That's the real Joe Biden. VOTE! — Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) November 1, 2022 G.W.'s question: I noticed was that he writes "take the vaccine," rather than "get the vaccine." To me, […]
Permalink
September 10, 2022 @ 6:51 pm
· Filed under Computational linguistics, Phonetics and phonology
Or rather: Against the simplistic interpretation of physics-based abstractions as equal to more complex properties of the physical universe. And narrowing the focus further, it's a big mistake to analyze signals in terms of such abstractions, while pretending that we're analyzing the processes creating those signals, or our perceptions of those signals and processes. This […]
Permalink
July 20, 2022 @ 9:43 am
· Filed under Phonetics and phonology, Psychology of language
It's been a while since my last Breakfast Experiment™, but a conversation yesterday spurred me to run a simple data-analysis script with interesting results, presented below. The script and the results are simple, but the issues are complicated — consider yourself warned.
Permalink
October 27, 2021 @ 7:40 am
· Filed under Morphology, Psychology of language
Helen Barrett, "‘Ça plane pour moi’ was a burst of Belgian punk with a dark twin", Financial Times 6/1/2020 [emphasis added]: Meanwhile, the perennially lucrative “Ça plane pour moi” may not be all that it seems. Bertrand mimed it in TV studios, but whose is the bratty voice on the record? It is a question […]
Permalink
September 29, 2021 @ 9:28 pm
· Filed under Language and biology, Lost in translation
From a Chinese fish market:
Permalink
July 8, 2021 @ 7:33 am
· Filed under Elephant semifics
It's often observed that current AI systems will generalize confidently to areas far away from anything in their training, where the right answer should be "huh?" This is true even when other available algorithms, often simple ones, could easily diagnose the lack of fit to expectations. We've seen many amusing examples, which we've filed in […]
Permalink
December 9, 2019 @ 9:03 am
· Filed under Alphabets, Language reform, Writing systems
The vast majority of people, both inside and outside of China, input characters on cell phones, computers, and other electronic devices via Hanyu Pinyin or other phonetic script. Naturally, this has had a huge impact on the relationship between users of the Chinese script and their command of the characters, since they are no longer […]
Permalink